Book Review: Andalusia Dogs by Christian Baines

“There’s nothing wrong with having fears. Some would say it’s crucial. The fear of never being loved? Never being desired? Feeling like your creativity and vision aren’t wanted, even in a city that seems open to everything? Rejection is a universal fear.” – Christian Baines, Andalusia Dogs

SET in Madrid during the early 1980s, when Spain was shedding the last remnants of dictatorship and beginning to breathe with a new, albeit chaotic freedom, Christian Baines’ Andalusia Dogs immerses readers in a world pulsing with artistic rebellion, sensuality, and transformation. It’s a setting tailor-made for Baines’ distinctive voice, blending sensual, lyrical writing with an authentic understanding of queer experiences.

Andalusia Dogs is more than a great work of historical fiction with a queer perspective; it serves as an act of cultural revival that embraces queer expression. Baines vividly captures Madrid’s post-Franco renaissance, known as the Movida Madrileña, with such vibrant detail that the city itself feels alive. Every street, theatre, and nightclub pulses with the promise of reinvention.

Through Alex, a true artistic soul yearning to create something meaningful, the reader navigates the intersections of ambition, love, and identity, stepping into a fascinating world of underground theatre, dance, and music. These scenes are more than colourful settings; they are visual acts of defiance, where art becomes both a means of survival and a way to reclaim identity and self-expression, often in queer context.

What gives the novel its particular queer resonance is the authenticity of Baines’ own-voice perspective. His handling of queer identity—specifically gay and bisexual, here—feels both understood and lived-in rather than observed, capturing the contradictions, humour, boldness, and quiet moments that mark genuine experience.

Here, Baines writes queer lives not as spectacles but as the natural, beating heart of a story about artistic creation and belonging, whether among a scene, a tight-knit group of friends, or even romantic/sexual relationships. His characters are never caricatures of suffering or rebellion, queer or not; they are complex, flawed artists trying to make meaning in a time when purpose and direction, both personally and socially, are in flux.

This authenticity ties Andalusia Dogs beautifully to Baines’ earlier Haunted Hearts novel, Geist Fleisch. [Go read my review of this novel in an earlier BLOG post.] While Geist Fleisch explores pre–World War II Berlin, that intoxicating, precarious world of cabaret, politics, and queerness, Andalusia Dogs feels like its spiritual successor. Both novels depict societies standing on the edge of profound transformation, for better or worse, where creativity thrives in defiance of repression and threat.

Baines is adept at drawing parallels between these eras. Berlin’s smoke-filled cabarets echo through Madrid’s experimental theatres and underground clubs; both are crucibles of queer expression and artistic transgression. The lineage is unmistakable—a historical continuity of marginalized voices refusing to be silenced.

Make no mistake, Andalusia Dogs stands firmly on its own. Where Geist Fleisch examined the tension between decadence and destruction, this novel delves into rebirth and reclamation. The post-dictatorship context gives its art scene a distinctly hopeful, if still volatile, energy. There’s joy in its chaos; it’s a sense that something new can be built from the ruins of political and social repression. The characters’ performances, rehearsals, and nightly escapades hum with creative urgency, and Baines writes these scenes with the eye of someone who knows how bodies move onstage and how hearts move off it— well, bodies off-stage, too, if you get my meaning.

Central to that movement is Jago, the novel’s most enigmatic figure. He is a mystery, a lover, and a muse—a character defined by contradiction. Baines constructs Jago as a study in dualism: alluring yet unknowable, both catalyst and consequence. Through Alex’s eyes, Jago becomes the personification of art’s intoxicating power: beautiful, dangerous, transformative, and, ultimately, impossible to contain. The layers of secrecy surrounding him give the novel its psychological and supernatural depth. Just as the city thrums with a tension between repression and release, Jago embodies the same dual energy; he is a man shaped by the need to bewitch, create, hide, and endure.

As the story unfolds, the boundaries between performance and reality blur, and Baines uses this uncertainty masterfully. The reader is never quite sure where Jago’s truth begins or ends, nor how much of Alex’s perception is coloured by desire and projection. This narrative tension builds toward a twist that is both devastating and illuminating.

Without revealing specifics, it’s safe to say that the final revelations reframe much of what came before. I was genuinely unprepared for the ending, and its suddenness and emotional precision left me both unsettled and quite intrigued. It’s in that final act that Baines’ horror element truly emerges, in the traditional sense and the horror of self-deception, of art consuming life and vice versa. There’s a lot to experience and unpack here. Again, I did not see this twist, this paranormal element of the novel, coming. Bravo.

In Andalusia Dogs, Baines once again showcases his skill in creating mood, atmosphere, and emotional depth. His prose is rich yet disciplined, expressive without ever feeling excessive or weighed down by flowery language. Now, as a reader and a writer, I love evocative prose, and I’ve found that Baines’ writing always finds that perfect line between deliciously palatable and too much. Sentences resonate with rhythm, much like the music and dance that live within the pages of the novel. It’s a book about the danger and necessity of creation, the cost of visibility, and the unrelenting beauty of lives lived in authenticity and defiance of silence and oppression.

Of course, nothing is ever a smooth ride, which only makes the narrative more engaging; the story is a rollercoaster of emotion and pathos! Case in point: Jago’s mysterious nature is both seductive and infuriating.

By the time the curtain falls, Andalusia Dogs has done what great fiction always should: it leaves the reader changed, haunted, and hungry for more. It’s a poignant continuation of Baines’ exploration of queer art and identity through history, and one of his most emotionally resonant works to date, in my opinion. It’s passionate, unpredictable, and utterly unforgettable.

Andalusia Dogs is available for purchase online at amazon.ca, amazon.com, and amazon.ca.uk (etc.). Also, it is available from Kindle Unlimited.

For more information about this author, follow Christian Baines on InstagramFacebook, and Bluesky. Also, visit his Website.

Book Review: Heart of the Wren by Glenn Quigley

“We return what was taken, with love and humility. No harm was intended. We ask for peace and we ask for calm. So mote it be.” – Glenn Quigley, Heart of the Wren

GLENN Quigley’s Heart of the Wren offers a significant contribution to the evolving landscape of gay/queer historical romance fiction. Set in rural Ireland during the 1980s, the novel intertwines supernatural folklore, mature gay male desire, and a richly atmospheric setting to create a love story that is both evocative and subtly subversive.

At the center of the story are Lorcan, a solitary gay farmer haunted by his past, and burly Dara, his new lodger and farmhand, who is also a practicing witch. When Lorcan discovers a mysterious Celtic brooch, a series of strange and magical disturbances disrupts his quiet life. As Lorcan and Dara work together to uncover the mystery—and grow closer to one another—the novel unfolds into a tender romance that challenges dominant tropes found in historical, romance, and gay/queer fiction.

Heart of the Wren initiates a broader queering of historical narratives, constructions of masculinity, ideals of the sexually desirable body, and normative assumptions regarding the preferred age of romantic protagonists.

A central contribution of the novel lies in its portrayal of gay male intimacy in a setting rarely associated with queer visibility. By placing two gay men at the heart of the narrative in rural 1980s Ireland—a time and place frequently pictured as having strong religious beliefs and conservative social values (you get a taste of this type of atmosphere in the excellent 2017 UK film God’s Own Country)—Quigley queers both the romance genre and the historical setting. Rather than relegating queer characters to the margins or suggesting their existence as tragic or clandestine, the novel affirms their centrality, agency, and desirability.

This is particularly evident in how both Lorcan and Dara are portrayed as emotionally complex and physically grounded characters, despite the presence of the supernatural. Their relationship develops gradually through trust and shared labour, offering a form of queer relationality that challenges the normative model of youthful, hetero-romantic love typically found in the genre. Writing from an “Own-Voices” perspective, the author brings an authenticity to his gay/queer characters that is not only convincing but deeply satisfying

Quigley’s treatment of setting is equally significant. The isolated Irish farm is traditionally a space of rugged masculinity, agrarian hardship, and patriarchal order—none of which are typically considered fertile ground for queer life. Homoerotic, sure, but to move beyond that? In Heart of the Wren, the farm becomes a queer space, a place where alternative ways of being can quietly flourish. Dara’s witchcraft and his integration into Lorcan’s daily life subtly destabilize not just the norms but even the expectations of rural respectability, introducing liminality, connection, and, of course, sensuality into the harsh rhythms of conventional agricultural life.

The novel’s evocation of Irish folklore, especially the use of “Wren Day” and the haunting wrenboys—a fascinating celebration I knew nothing about previously—further subverts the landscape by embedding queerness within cultural memory and ritual. The story links gay/queer desire and love to old myths passed down through generations. This connection disrupts the conventional narrative of romance stories, which typically follow a straightforward, traditional (heteronormative and chronological) timeline of love and life events. Quigley’s fiction is often like this and expertly executed. I myself have utilized this unconventional process, specifically with my split-time Haunted Hearts novel, The Night Belongs To Lovers. It’s not everyone’s cup-of-tea, but I highly enjoy it.

Both Lorcan and Dara are described as “beefy” and “burly” working-class men: strong, physically capable, but not idealized in the typical romance fashion. They are older than many romance protagonists, and their bodies bear the marks of labour and life. This resistance to polished, youthful gay bodies contributes to a broader gay/queer aesthetics of realism and inclusivity in romance fiction. And I’m here for it! These are not heroes or idols who deserve the reader’s lust and adoration because they are flawless and perfect; instead, they are desired and fascinating because they are realistic and relatable, and this is a quality that can thrive within the Romance genre. In this way, Quigley joins a growing number of queer authors challenging the erasure of older, fuller-bodied men as leads in Gay and M/M fiction.

As both an author and a reader of gay fiction, I feel it’s still a transgressive thing to write about queer lives that resist the idealization of youth, conventional beauty, and urban sexuality as the only markers of valid queer experience. Good on ya, Mr. Quigley!

Importantly, the novel’s romantic arc does not rely on tragedy, secrecy, or social ruin, as is often the case with queer characters in period settings. Instead, Quigley offers what might be described as a gay/queer pastoral: a vision of rural life that allows for love, magic, and belonging outside of societal surveillance. This refusal of queer tragedy is not a denial of conflict; Lorcan, in particular, wrestles with “old pain” and emotional isolation, likely stemming from years of repression and the loneliness of rural life. Yet the conflict is resolved not through exile or loss but through intimacy and mutual care.

This emphasis on healing and interdependence reflects key themes often found in queer identity, a focus on chosen family, authentic expressions of love and desire, and the affective networks that sustain queer lives in the absence of traditional (support) systems.

Quigley beautifully blends historical flavour with the paranormal, locating romance within a space that’s temporary yet ever-changing and culturally specific. The 1980s Ireland setting adds a layer of socio-political tension without being overtly didactic. It situates the characters in a believable, lived world—one shaped by religious conservatism, local myth, and unspoken codes—but allows them to find joy and connection regardless. The novel resists both the sanitized vision of gay/queer love common in some contemporary romance and the relentless “trauma narrative” often found in queer fiction, historical or not.

Despite my deep analysis (I just can’t help myself!), Heart of the Wren absolutely leans more towards romantic idealism than radical social critique. The main antagonist is a supernatural threat rather than issues like overt homophobia or societal exclusion.

Ultimately, Heart of the Wren offers a heartfelt, textured, and beautifully imagined queer romance that situates love in a space often denied to it: rural, historical, and magical. Through its attention to older gay/queer characters, its affirmation of embodied desire, and its integration of folklore and witchcraft, the novel expands the boundaries of both historical romance and queer fiction, yet combines them wonderfully. It reminds us that queer lives have always existed not just in cities and subcultures but in fields, farms, and folk stories—often in silence, but no less vibrantly. In this, Quigley has not just written a love story; he has reclaimed space and time for queer possibility. Heart of the Wren is truly a wonderful book.

For more information about this author, follow Glenn Quigley on InstagramFacebookBluesky, or visit his Website, where you can sign up for his Newsletter.

To purchase Heart of the Wren, head to his Amazon Author Page.

INTERVIEW WITH GAY/QUEER HISTORICAL ROMANCE AUTHOR GLENN QUIGLEY

Glenn Quigley: “Coming from an Own-Voice perspective means I can draw from lived experience, not just from what I’ve read online. My characters can be people, not catchphrases.”

GLENN Quigley is an author and artist originally from Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland, now living in Lisburn, Northern Ireland, with his husband, Mark. His debut novel, The Moth and Moon, was published in 2018 by Ninestar Press, marking the beginning of a rich and compelling literary career that emphasizes showcasing gay/queer narratives. [Self-Portrait (in above image) by Glenn Quigley.]

Since then, Glenn has released an impressive lineup of novels, including The Lion Lies Waiting, We Cry The Sea, These Young Wolves: The Knights of Blackrabbit (Book One), followed by its sequel, The Star We Sail By: The Knights of Blackrabbit (Book Two), and Teacup Promises. He is also the author of  Curse of the Stag’s Eye and Heart of the Wren—part of the own-voice gay paranormal romance series, Haunted Hearts [That I am also a part of—PLUG!].

His shorter works include the poignant short story Use as Wallpaper (Ninestar Press) and the festive holiday novella The Great Santa Showdown, published by JMS Books and featured in the 2023 Top Ten Gay Fiction anthology.

In addition to his writing, Glenn is a talented portrait artist working in acrylics and watercolours. He also lends his creative talents to the popular brand themoodybear.com as a designer. In 2022, he created a portrait series inspired by the characters from The Moth and Moon trilogy. This collection was exhibited at the Kallio Library in Finland and showcased at a gay cultural event in Estonia.

In this interview, Glenn and I discuss various topics, including the importance of diverse body types in romance fiction, his passion for nautical-themed narratives, and the impact of writing from an Own-Voice perspective.

My review of Glenn Quigley’s Haunted Hearts novel, Curse of the Stag’s Eye, can be found in an earlier blog post. 

When you reflect on the beginnings of your writing, both as a personal outlet for creative expression and as a step toward professional goals, who or what stands out as your greatest source of inspiration? At what moment did you realize it was time to move beyond writing for yourself and enter the daunting world of publishing? How do you navigate the vulnerability and anxiety that can come with sharing your work with a wider, global audience?

I wrote my first novel the year I dropped out of a college course as an adult student. I was 38 or 39, and I’d gone back to college to get a proper qualification in graphic design. The first year was fine because it was at an art college, but the second year was more formal, and I hated it immediately—so I left.

Suddenly, I had a whole year ahead of me with nothing planned (apart from my day job), and I felt a crushing need to have something to show for it, since I wasn’t going to get the qualification I’d wanted.

I’d been writing on and off since I was a kid—just little snippets of things, here and there. My mother would often ask me if I’d “done any writing lately.” One day, I sat down and told myself I was going to write a short story. That was it. A good, proper, solid short story. With a beginning, middle, and end. I worked out what it was about, and I wrote it over the course of a few weeks. Once it was done, I wondered if I could maybe, possibly expand it into a novel. Could I? Ah, sure, why not? I’d give it a go, and if it didn’t work, nobody ever needed to know.

So I tried. And it worked. And that novel became The Moth and Moon. I showed it to a friend who I knew would be honest with me, and he said he liked it. Then I wondered if I could get it published. I don’t remember exactly why I thought that, but I started looking into agents and publishers. I knew nothing whatsoever about the publishing industry—which, in hindsight, was probably a good thing, since I didn’t know enough to be discouraged.

Anyway, within a few months, the book was (and still is) published by NineStar Press. I hadn’t told anyone I was trying to get it published. In fact, I hadn’t even told anyone (except for that one friend) that I’d written a book, so everyone was surprised—especially my now-husband.

I’m not sure how I got over the anxiety that comes with putting your work out in the world. I suppose I often think about how many huge, critically acclaimed bestsellers I’ve read and hated, and try to remember that there will always be someone who loves and someone who hates my work. That’s just human nature. Besides, would you rather have published a book that some people don’t like or not have published a book at all?

What is it about the romance genre, particularly when it comes to relationships between men, that excites and inspires you? Is it as basic as you being a gay man simply wanting to tell gay stories? How much do your own experiences with love and relationships influence the way you write romance in your fiction? 

I love the comfort of a romance, I suppose. The knowledge that things will work out in the end. And it’s nice to showcase fuller-figured men in romance, as we’re often overlooked.

Do gay love stories offer something inherently different from traditional heterosexual romances? Should they be approached from a distinct perspective to authentically reflect the queer or same-sex experience, rather than simply feeling like a heterosexual story with the genders swapped?

They absolutely do need to be approached differently, and I think you can often tell when they’re just gender swapped straight romances. The dynamics between two men is different than between a man and a woman, I think. Socially, politically, sexually, etc.

There’s an honesty (often a brutal, self-deprecating honesty) that comes from a gay man writing about gay men (or any LGBTQ+ person writing about their own experiences) that’s hard to quantify and harder to authentically replicate if you don’t have that lived experience. (I’m not saying that everyone should only write characters that match them one-to-one, of course. That would be insane. There’s room for everyone.) [Male Nude (in above image) by Glenn Quigley.]

Gay/queer romance, particularly M/M, can sometimes fall into formulaic tropes or even veer into fetishization. Your work often includes masculine, hirsute, mature men who may identify in gay culture as bears, otters, and even daddies. How do you ensure emotional honesty and depth in your storytelling so that these narratives feel genuine rather than contrived? Do you find that, as a gay author, writing from an Own-Voices perspective gives you a unique advantage in achieving that authenticity?

I approach them as characters first and labels second. If you start from “Okay, this character is a “twink” or “this character is a bear,” then you run the risk of falling headfirst into stereotypes, and it can be harder to break out and find room for the character to move and grow. Start with them as people first, and then see how their identity fits in and informs their decisions.

Coming from an Own-Voice perspective means I can draw from lived experience, not just from what I’ve read online. My characters can be people, not catchphrases.

Speaking more on daddies, otters, and bears—oh my! Your stories, as mentioned above, often center on men who bring lived experience and emotional nuance to queer romance. These are characters whose journeys unfold beyond youth, coming out, and first love as they navigate gay/queer desire, identity, and vulnerability. Are you particularly drawn to writing romance from the perspective of older or more experienced gay characters, as opposed to younger or coming-of-age protagonists? What is it about this stage of life—or this type of character—that resonates so strongly with you and influences how you navigate the landscape of queer romance? Are stories centred on older gay men, like yourself, underrepresented in queer romance and fiction more broadly?

I suppose it’s because I’m middle-aged, so I want to see more characters that I can more easily relate to. And I’ve always been attracted to older men, so that’s definitely part of it too. Plus, so many gay stories focus on coming out and coming-of-age stuff that writing about older, more settled characters is a way to stand out from the crowd and add something new to the mix. And older gay male characters are definitely underrepresented in fiction, especially romance. They may crop up as the substitute father figure, or cuddly uncle, or whatever, but how many chubby daddies get to be the protagonist?!

 In many of your novels, particularly The Moth and Moon, The Lion Lies Waiting, and We Cry the Sea, nautical themes and seafaring life play a central role, not just as setting but as emotional landscape. Wind, water, solitude, salt, and distance create a vivid atmosphere that carries emotional weight, evoking freedom, isolation, danger, and even rebirth. How do these themes serve your characters or shape their emotional journeys? How do you use these sensory details to enrich the romance or tension in your stories? Is there a personal connection?

I love the sea, I always have. (Can I swim? No. But can I sail? Also, no.) So, when building a world, I often use the sea as a sort of “happy place” to start from. With The Moth and Moon, the very earliest version had the story set on the coast of Cornwall in the UK. However, I quickly realized that the remote, isolated setting of a tiny island would be a far better reflection of the main character’s loneliness and sense of being isolated from his community. Plus, having it be a small island was a contrast to his physical size. (Robin Shipp, the protagonist of The Moth and Moon, is the tallest man on the island, as well as being a big, heavy guy.)

Given that these books are set in an alt-history 18th century, the sea holds a lot of promise for exploration and adventure. We’ve all seen plenty of films and books with swashbuckling action and wistful gazes from seashores, so I think a nautical setting creates an instant mood in the reader’s mind.

Your storytelling beautifully blends atmospheric, well-researched historical detail with modern romance. Could you describe your process for weaving history and lore into your fiction?

While I often read for research, I’m mainly a visual learner, so I watch a lot of documentaries to nail down the facts of a given topic as best I can. Once I’ve got a fairly good grip on something, it gives me a basis from which to expand and twist. (And once I’m done, I immediately forget everything I’ve learned, which is why I make copious notes.)

The world of The Moth and Moon is historical fantasy, which means I’ve got room to manoeuvre and change things to suit my needs. Knowingly introducing anachronistic elements is a good way to give a little clue and nod to the reader to say, “This is the past, but it isn’t our past.” I think of things like the bathrooms in The Moth and Moon and the hot water pipes all over the town of Port Knot in the Knights of Blackrabbit series.

Paranormal fiction doesn’t always need explicit horror to be impactful. With your Haunted Hearts series novels, Curse of the Stag’s Eye and your recently released Heart of the Wren, what do you think makes a paranormal story—whether it’s romance, adventure, drama, or another genre—resonate emotionally with readers beyond the scares? Does working within the supernatural genre change how you approach your writing? How does it compare to writing straightforward historical fiction, like your Knights of Blackrabbit series (These Young Wolves and The Star We Sail By), or a rom-com such as your holiday novella The Great Santa Showdown?

I approach all my stories from the same starting point. I come up with characters that I think work well together, I flesh out their story arcs as best I can, and then I see how the plot can unfold to best tell their story. The characters often morph as I figure out what the actual plot is, as each part of the story naturally informs every other part. The emotion—the stakes—comes from the characters, from their chemistry, from what we know about them. It doesn’t really matter what happens externally if you don’t care about the characters and want them to be together and to be happy.

If you had the chance to step into the life of one of your own characters, which one would you choose, and why? What qualities, experiences, or inner conflicts make this character resonate with you on a personal level? In what ways do they reflect your worldview, values, or perhaps aspects of yourself that you don’t often express? What sets this character apart from the others you’ve created? Would you say they reveal more of you than most? Was there perhaps an instance of “author slippage” coming through when you wrote this character, conscious of the fact or otherwise?

I never consciously put myself in my stories, although many people tell me they see a lot of me in Robin Shipp (from The Moth and Moon). Given that he’s very large, clumsy, and not that bright, I’m never quite sure how to take it. But I suppose I can see their point. He was my first “real” character, so I suppose he’s got a lot of me in him. And while I don’t know that I’d want to be him exactly, I’d definitely pick his world to live in—a world without prejudice towards LGBTQ+ people, a world where gender isn’t an issue, a world where kindness wins. It would be nice.

Glenn, fiction is just one facet of your creative identity. You’re also an accomplished visual artist, working across a wide range of media including acrylics, watercolours, pastels, pencil, and ink. How does your process as an artist compare to your process as a writer? Do these disciplines offer distinct avenues for expression, or do they intersect in ways that surprise even you? You’ve merged them beautifully in the past, such as the limited edition art print you released for purchase alongside your first Haunted Hearts novel, Curse of the Stag’s Eye.  You also designed both Haunted Hearts series’ Logos. When it comes to time, emotional investment, and creative fulfilment, how do visual and literary storytelling measure up for you, particularly within your more mature, occasionally erotic, body of work?

They each scratch a particular itch in my brain. There are days when all I want to do is write, and there are days when all I want to do is draw. (And when I say days, they can sometimes be weeks or even months.) They both allow me to express my ideas in different ways. [Self Portrait (in image on right) by Glenn Quigley.]

Some ideas can only be realized visually, while others can only be expressed in writing. I love being able to illustrate my characters. I had a long-running feature in my newsletter where I provided portraits and biographies of my characters from The Moth and the Moon universe. They’re all up on my website. [Link at bottom].

It was also fun to design the maps of the islands (also on my website) where those stories are set. I know some readers prefer not to see character art and instead let the books form an image in their minds, but I think if I can expand the books into another medium, I might as well.

I’m a comic book fan at heart, so I think there’s always something in me that wants to see my stories as well as read them. 

What book(s) are you currently devouring? Do you have a preferred genre, or are your reading preferences quite diverse?

I’ve just finished a beta read of a friend’s novel (it’s great!), and before that, I was reading a book about lighthouses (because I’m always on brand, apparently). I don’t really have a favourite genre. I read for research as much as for pleasure. It takes me quite a while to read a book, weirdly enough. I think my next one is going to be one of the Haunted Hearts books. I’ve already read one, Christian Baines’ Andalusia Dogs, and it was fantastic, so I can’t wait to see what the rest of the series holds.

 What does the future hold for author Glenn Quigley? Outside of the Haunted Hearts series, do you have any desire to explore the world of the supernatural further? Are there plans to continue any of your historical fiction series? Give us a glimpse into your future!

My books often feature a supernatural element. Ghost stories crop up a lot. There’s one in The Moth and Moon, another in We Cry the Sea, and even in my contemporary novel, Teacup Promises. I really want to do something with the paranormal podcast gang from Curse of the Stag’s Eye, and they are connected to the characters from Heart of the Wren (How? You’ll have to read it to find out!), so I can see myself staying in the world of the paranormal for a while longer.

I have started writing book three of the Knights of Blackrabbit series (it isn’t a trilogy, it’s an ongoing), which I put on pause to write Heart of the Wren. Believe it or not, I actually woke up this morning with the Blackrabbit characters talking in my head, so I think they’re getting impatient. I should really get back to them.

Thank you so much, Glenn, for sharing your journey and thoughts on your work in Gay/Queer Paranormal and Historical Romance. It was a pleasure to hear about what motivates you as both an author and an artist. I look forward to seeing where your future projects take you! 

For more information about this author and artist, follow Glenn Quigley on InstagramFacebookBluesky, or visit his Website, where you can sign up for his Newsletter and purchase his artwork.

To purchase Glenn’s books, head to Barnes & Noble, Indigo, and Smashwords. Also check out his website and his Amazon Author Page.

Canadian LGBTQ+ Culture & The Shift In Queer Theory

THIS article was sparked by a discussion I had with my husband about my occasional use of Queer Theory in conversations about contemporary queer issues, as well as in literary and other contexts. He pointed out that some of the terminology felt “dated.” So, I wondered: has Queer Theory evolved, or is it outdated? Am I utilizing antiquated thinking?

Queer Theory emerged in the 1990s to question and disrupt conventional notions of gender and sexuality. Canada had developed its own unique characteristics around Queer Theory, shaped by the country’s specific cultural, political, and social contexts.

In the mid-to-late 1990s, while I was studying at the University of Guelph, Queer Theory was a significant part of both my academic focus and the activist discussions around me—especially through my involvement with GLoBe, our university’s so-so diverse queer social group. It was an exciting time, but also a challenging one (though, when isn’t it?).

The LGBTQ+ community (then referred to as LGBT) was becoming increasingly visible, with individuals “coming out” at younger ages than in previous years. At the same time, we were still grappling with the devastating effects of the AIDS crisis, ongoing discrimination, and limited legal protections. In this context, Queer Theory in Canada emerged as a powerful tool for critique.

Canadian queer thinkers and artists were adopting ideas from poststructuralist theory, but grounding them in local, lived issues, such as public health policy, censorship, and national identity. There were also significant conversations around rights—same-sex marriage and adoption were central concerns—but there was just as much energy devoted to questioning the systems behind those struggles.

Creative minds like Thomas Waugh, Gary Kinsman, John Greyson, and Sky Gilbert were key voices in this movement. Waugh, for instance, explored how queer cinema could be both erotic and political, resisting dominant narratives about who queer people were supposed to be. Greyson did this, too, especially in his groundbreaking film Zero Patience (1993), which took on the AIDS crisis through musical, campy, and radically political storytelling.

Gary Kinsman’s work, especially his book The Regulation of Desire, showed how deeply the Canadian state had policed sexuality, whether through criminal law or Cold War-era surveillance by the RCMP. His work reminded us that queer lives were always being shaped by broader systems of power and control, not just by cultural representation.

Sky Gilbert, who often spoke at our university’s queer events, brought a sharp, theatrical, and often provocative voice to queer issues. His work wasn’t for everyone; some folks found it too sexually charged and focused on a white, gay male perspective/experience. Still, the man and his work have always been undeniably bold, honest, and unapologetic.

In the 90s, Canadian Queer Theory leaned heavily into anti-assimilationist politics, often inspired by groups like ACT UP and Queer Nation. But it also had to navigate Canada’s particular form of liberal multiculturalism, where diversity was celebrated in theory. However, many queer, Indigenous, and racialized people still faced serious marginalization in practice.

Fast forward to today, and it’s clear how many things have shifted. Contemporary Queer Theory in Canada is deeply entrenched in intersectionality, decolonial theory, trans studies, and grassroots activism. It’s less about just deconstructing gender and sexuality and more about building new ways of living and relating, especially in communities facing multiple layers of oppression.

One of the most significant shifts has been the rise of Indigenous queer and Two-Spirit voices, which have challenged both heteronormativity and the assumptions baked into early Queer Theory itself. And these aren’t “new concepts.” I had an indigenous ex-boyfriend back in university (who shared the same name as me—yes, we were called “The Ryans”) who introduced me to Two-Spiritness. (Side note: In the 90s, I dated not one, but TWO men with the same name as me. Don’t ask.)

Academics and writers like Lindsay Nixon and Billy-Ray Belcourt have urged us to rethink everything, from how colonialism influences queer identities to how liberation is inextricably linked to land, culture, and sovereignty. Belcourt, a Cree poet and theorist, writes beautifully about queer Indigenous life, not just as a struggle, but as something full of love and possibility. In his book A History of My Brief Body (2020), he weaves together desire, trauma, and hope, showing how queer and Indigenous worlds intersect.

Two-Spirit perspectives, in particular, have called out the limitations of Western ideas of queerness and gender, pointing instead to pre-colonial understandings that don’t fit neatly into those frameworks. This has compelled Canadian queer theory to look beyond its academic roots and thoughtfully engage with histories and experiences that were often overlooked in earlier conversations.

Syrus Marcus Ware, a Black trans artist and theorist, is a voice at the forefront of this shift. His work blends abolitionist politics, disability justice, and trans liberation, offering a vision of queer futurity that’s deeply rooted in care, resistance, and community.

So where early Queer Theory in Canada was about breaking categories and subverting norms, today’s queer thought is about survival, solidarity, and collective care. It’s a move from theory as critique to theory as action; still rigorous, but grounded in lived experience and real-world change.

Throughout all of this, Canadian queer culture has played a significant role in shaping Queer Theory, not just responding to global trends, but also helping to transform what queer thinking and action can look like. From the radical disruptions of the 1990s to the intersectional, decolonial, and community-focused work of today, Canadian queer thought reminds us: queerness isn’t just about identity and sexuality. It’s about challenging power, imagining new futures, and building something better as a cooperative voice.

So, the verdict is—? Although 1990s Queer Theory had a significant impact during its time, it’s essential to recognize that this intellectual movement has continued to evolve and change over the years. I’ve now made it a point to engage with the nuances and complexities of contemporary Queer Theory. I’m certain my husband will be thrilled when I use new terms to strengthen my arguments during our friendly debates on literature et all.  

Book Review: By Gaslight by Steven Price

“He had long yellow teeth, a wide face, sunken eyes, pupils as dark as the twist of a man’s intestines.” Steven Price, By Gaslight

STEVEN Price’s By Gaslight is a sprawling, atmospheric historical fiction novel that immerses readers in the thick, sooty fog of London in 1885. It delves deep into the hidden chambers of grief, longing, and identity. The book blends elements of Gothic horror, Victorian grittiness, and queer subtext (wait and hear me out with this aspect…), presenting itself as less of a traditional detective story and more of a slow-burning meditation on the nature of being haunted: by love, by legacy, and by the unknowable truths of others.

At the narrative’s center are two men: William Pinkerton, son of the famed American detective, and Adam Foole, a gentleman thief drawn into London in search of his lost love. They are united by the spectre of Edward Shade, a mythic criminal who once eluded William’s father and now slips through the gaslit shadows of William’s own obsessive pursuit. Their journeys unfold across continents and memories, from war-ravaged battlefields to South African mines, from opium dens to séance halls, mapping a world where secrets rot just beneath the surface.

The Gothic atmosphere is omnipresent and skillfully depicted. Price’s London is a decaying, suffocating city; its air thickened by coal smoke, loss, and regret. The physical environment often mirrors psychological states: pathetic fallacy, a favourite Gothic element of mine. Streets and alleyways twist like jumbled thoughts; darkness and shadows conceal past wrongs, and sewers and loamy earth exhale the stench of things, perhaps people, meant to stay long buried. It’s a city of hauntings, but not so much in the supernatural sense: emotional and moral. This is a story where a place and time, past or present, clings to the characters like damp London fog on skin. (Am I making this sound like a Wilkie Collins’ novel?)

Traditional Gothic motifs abound: mistaken identities, lost loves, spectral figures, and decaying grandeur. Yet Price doesn’t deploy these simply for genre effect. Instead, they create a narrative space where emotional states—grief, obsession, betrayal—are rendered viscerally. The characters are all, in their own ways, haunted. William by his father’s unreachable legacy, Adam by the absence of a woman he once loved, and all by Shade, a figure less man than myth. That Shade may not even exist in the form they imagine only heightens the sense of chasing phantoms.

Set firmly in the Victorian era, the novel also explores the social tensions of the time, though often as backdrop rather than critique. Class divides are starkly illustrated: the genteel surface of London masks a grimy underworld of poverty and exploitation. Meanwhile, Victorian anxieties about science and superstition (How Mary Shelley!), identity and respectability, empire and its costs, all pulse beneath the surface.

Now, let’s take a look at the novel’s compelling queer undercurrents—nuanced, never explicit, but present in tone and structure if one “queers the text.” There is no overt gay/queer romance in the narrative, and I doubt the author intended any; still, the novel teems with queer potential. It resides in the intense emotional bonds between men—a homosocial backdrop, in the way identity slips and reshapes, and in the silences where desire and longing (may) exist. My intent is not to take anything away from platonic friendships and camaraderie between men; I am merely presenting the possibility for a different reader perspective.

The queer subtext aligns with Gothic tradition, where themes of forbidden desire, blurred identity, and unspoken tensions often drive the emotional core of the story. Consider the relationship between Count Dracula and Jonathan Harker in Stoker’s novel. In the repressive moral climate of Victorian society, where deviations from societal norms had to remain concealed, the Gothic genre served as a platform to explore what could not be explicitly stated. Price follows this tradition but stops short of fully illuminating these themes, again, because he presumably, consciously, never intended them.

Here are some great examples of coded subtext within the novel:

“Desire often lives in the silences between words, in the things we dare not say.”
“To be seen is to be vulnerable. To be unseen is to be free — and utterly alone.”

This is what makes “queering a text” so exciting, if you know what to look for. That said, I wasn’t consciously looking for it as I read this novel, but lines like the ones above sparked something in me that caused me to “queer between the lines.”

Structurally, the novel requires patience and diligence to get the Poe-esque style pay-off. Perhaps even an
appreciation for the non-traditional technique. Its length (I read the hardcover, which is nearly 740 pages!) and elliptical style may overwhelm some readers. Flashbacks within flashbacks, long descriptive passages, and multiple shifting perspectives abound. However, for those willing to surrender to its deliberate pace, the novel offers a richly layered experience.

I read one person describe Price’s writing here as “an extremely pretentious writing style,” which, of course, intrigued me. I appreciate a “so-called” pretentious writing style, particularly relating to 19th-century-centred fiction. It adds a sense of authenticity to the tone. Dan Simmons and Matthew Pearl are other modern authors who excel at capturing this historical fiction style. One reader’s “pretentious” is another’s “sophisticated flair.”

Steven Price’s By Gaslight is more than just a story about crime and pursuit; it’s a novel that explores the unseen aspects of human lives: the things and truths we hide and the identities and relationships we struggle to define. Price’s work integrates smoothly into the Gothic tradition while also making subtle and meaningful references to the queerness that has historically existed in society’s shadows, regardless of whether the author intended to infer this subtext or whether it was a happy accident that leaves room for reader inference. And if you leave me room, I will infer.

By Gaslight is available for purchase at indigoamazon.ca, Barnes and Noble, and amazon.com.

Canadian poet & novelist Steven Price does not actively participate in social media.

INTERVIEW WITH GAY ROMANCE AUTHOR SIMON DOYLE

Simon Doyle: “As a gay man, I write both of my younger self and to my younger self. I didn’t have any queer literature growing up, so I eventually turned to writing the stories I longed for.”

Simon Doyle is an Own-Voice, Irish author whose work explores the complex intersections of age, identity, love, and, occasionally, the supernatural, with an emphasis on gay/queer experiences. Driven by the stories he needed growing up, his storytelling features emotionally resonant characters, atmospheric settings, and a strong commitment to authenticity, providing readers with narratives that are entertaining, meaningful, and always diverse. He lives in Ireland with a neurotic rescue dog and his husband, Lucas.

Simon is the author of several gay YA romances, including The Sound of You, Snow Boys, with its short story companion piece entitled Snow Girl: A Snow Boy’s Story, and the two-book Runaway Bay series. He’s also penned the neo-gothic This Is Not A Vampire Story, a haunting gay paranormal romance.

In this interview, Simon and I explore a range of topics, including the use and impact of tropes and clichés, navigating queer trauma in fiction, and the ways personal life and history can shape one’s writing.

My review of Simon Doyle’s This Is Not A Vampire Story can be found in an earlier blog post.

When reflecting on the origins of your writing, both as a personal journey of creative expression and as a professional pursuit, who or what do you credit as your primary inspiration? At what point did you realize it was time to move beyond writing solely for yourself and step into the often intimidating realm of publishing? How do you manage the anxiety that comes with sharing your work with a global audience?

I don’t think I could credit any one particular author for inspiration as much as I (blame) my parents. They were both readers and taught me the value of a good book. They went from reading bedtime stories to me to helping me to read on my own. By the age of 4 or 5, I was reading Dr. Seuss books; by 7 or 8, I was reading old, yellowed copies of The Hardy Boys; and by 12, I was reading Stephen King (despite my mum’s warnings!). If I had to pick one author as an early influence, I’d go with Dr. Seuss. Those are the first books I actually remember reading on my own.

I’ve been writing for myself almost as long as I can remember. I started with some terrible poetry and some stick-figure comic book stories as a child, and I wrote my first full (completed) novel at 16. It was awful. Trust me, governments could use it as a torture device! But I’d dabbled in WattPad for a while, with some queer short stories, and the encouragement I received was immense. By the time I’d completed Runaway Train, it wasn’t so much a conscious decision to publish in book form (instead of piecemeal on WattPad) as a natural progression.

It was always my goal to be a writer, even when grown-ups said I needed a backup plan. I told my English teacher in high school to look out for my name on a book cover one day. I was 14 at the time, haha! So I never found it intimidating to put my work out there. Nerve-wracking, yes (it still is!), but never intimidating.

Sometimes I feel like I can’t manage the anxiety that comes with sharing my work. I’ve had to step away from social media a few times to breathe. Don’t ask me for a coping strategy, because my strategy is basically: close eyes, release book, cringe, wait for criticism, and repeat. And I can’t re-read that story later. As a writer, you know how it goes: the first draft is terrible, then you read and edit it a bazillion times. Once it’s out there, you can’t read it again, or you’ll find something wrong with it. I’m like that with life, too. Once it’s done, it’s done. Move on.

What about the genre of Romance, particularly within the realm of YA, inspires and excites you? In your view, what are the essential elements that make a love story truly compelling? How does writing gay/queer romance, especially in a young adult or teenager context, reshape or transform these elements, particularly when adapting traditionally heteronormative romance themes for a same-sex narrative?

Middle-grade stories are hopeful. Grown-up stories are often jaded and bleak. YA, for me, is that happy medium between the two. At 16, you still have hopes and dreams, but you know the way of the world. It’s that crossover between youthful, childish glee and the darkness of being an adult.

There’s also, for me, this second run of firsts. Your first run is the first step, first tooth, first word, etc. The second run of firsts is first kiss, first love, first heartbreak. And everything feels amplified as a teenager. I bet you still remember your first heartbreak. I certainly do! Those enormous emotions are what I love about YA. Give me angst mixed with the tenderness of tentative touches!

The essential elements of a love story have to be chemistry and conflict. Chemistry is what gives you butterflies right when you need them. Conflict is what gives you action and movement.

As a gay man, I write both of my younger self and to my younger self. I didn’t have any queer literature growing up, so I eventually turned to writing the stories I longed for. But queer stories themselves aren’t any different from heteronormative stories. I have always set out to show that queer love is just the same as straight love. We all have longing, joy, connection and heartbreak. Love is love. Isn’t that what we’ve been telling the world for decades?

Gay/Queer Romance, particularly M/M, as a genre can sometimes risk falling into formulaic tropes or fetishization. How do you maintain emotional honesty and depth in your stories, ensuring they feel genuine rather than performative? Do you find that writing from an Own-Voice perspective offers you a unique advantage in achieving this authenticity? 

Oh, I love a good trope! The Sound of You, for example, deliberately steals a number of tropes from Korean BL [Boys’ Love] stories. Our lives are built around tropes. Cliches are cliches for a reason. But tropes only work if they’re handled with care. As writers, we have to take the formula of the trope, decode it, and repackage it in a way that feels truthful. I want my characters to feel, not just do.

Writing from an Own-Voice perspective definitely has its advantages; I think it’s less a privilege than a responsibility. Representation matters. All stories (not just queer ones) can slip into caricatures if they’re not written well. I want to portray love in a way that feels genuine to me. It keeps coming back to: what is [this thing] for me? It’s more than authentic, it’s personal.

Do you think being gay subconsciously influences your work, making it inherently queer-centric? Or do you feel that, as a writer, you’re always aware of the content you include and you’re actively choosing to write with an LGBTQ+ focus?

I think it’s a little of both. Being gay influences the way I see the world; it’s part of who I am, so it’s going to shape the stories I tell. But I don’t feel as though I’m being intentional with it. I write the kinds of stories I wish I had as a kid, not because I feel limited to writing such stories, but because they represent me on the page. It’s intrinsic.

Snow Boys offers a powerful and intimate exploration of queer adolescence, capturing the fragile, urgent experience of young people coming to terms with their identities in a world that can be both cold and hostile. Set against a bleak, wintry backdrop that brilliantly mirrors the isolation many queer teens feel, the novel centres on characters wrestling with (internalized) homophobia, the fear of rejection, and the aching need for authentic connection. Your portrayal of queer youth is unapologetically honest; there’s no glossing over pain, confusion or the sometimes brutal realities of bullying and invisibility. Yet, you manage to keep it from getting too dark despite the serious themes; the balance between heartwarming and strife is just right. 

Since your YA novels, including Snow Boys, explore identity during some of the most formative, awkward, and vulnerable years for queer youth, how have you developed your approach to portraying queer trauma in a way that avoids exploitation or melodrama, while also being mindful of not retraumatizing readers?

It’s important to be honest about queer trauma because it’s part of so many young people’s realities. Pretending otherwise would feel false. But I’m equally conscious that these stories aren’t here to exploit pain or wallow in it. Trauma should never be used as shock value. It has to come from the characters and from the truth of their lives.

I try to ground those experiences in emotional authenticity, but always balance them with hope. Even in the darkest moments of Snow Boys, there’s connection, tenderness, and the possibility of love. Queer teens deserve to see not just the weight of the world but also the light that gets them through it, that crossover I talked about earlier.

Humour also plays a big role in that balance. I’m Irish, which means we’re great at laughing at ourselves. Humour is woven into my writing almost instinctively—it softens the blow of darker themes and keeps the story from sinking into despair. When something terrible occurs, I always follow it with something light. I think that’s just a natural instinct now. Readers, in my view, crave the warts of humanity, but they don’t want to feel depressed about it. Humour allows me to hit hard but still leave space for hope.

I don’t want someone to walk away retraumatized; they need to feel seen. If just one queer teen reads one of my books and feels a little less alone, then I’ve done my job. And honestly, I’m still getting fan mail from young men more than 2 years after its release, telling me how much it affected them. That alone is why I continue to do it.

Queer desire and loss are central to many Gothic narratives, though often portrayed in coded or tragic ways. In This is Not a Vampire Story, Victor cannot forget James, nor can he live fully in the present. His immortality becomes a kind of prolonged grief—an extended metaphor for the queer experience of carrying memory in a society that has long demanded forgetting, even repression. Much of Victor’s past occurs during a time when queer people were forced to hide their love and relationships.

Now, in the present, he works in a care home, still appearing seventeen, and surrounded by those nearing the end of their lives. His unchanging body contrasts with the aging world around him, and his queerness—like his vampirism—isolates him in a space meant for those nearing death. This setting brings a rare and poignant focus to the theme of queer aging and the emotional toll of surviving both time and erasure.

What drew you to explore the experience of outliving the people you’ve loved and filtering that narrative through the lens of a vampire (though you never use this supernatural classification in the story)? And what does it mean, in your view, for immortal Victor to carry those hidden histories into the present—memories that others have forgotten, or were never allowed to have and/or openly express in the first place? How did you consciously rewrite or reclaim classic Gothic tropes, particularly around loss, secrecy, and the passage of time, for a modern queer audience?

For me, immortality isn’t about glamour or power, it’s about memory. Victor can’t forget James, or any of the lives he’s touched, and that grief becomes part of him. In a way, he embodies the queer experience of carrying memory in a world that has often demanded forgetting or repression. He’s a reminder that history doesn’t vanish just because society looks away.

How he came to be is a complex story. Pain and regret have always had a place in my novels, so what better way to show that than forcing one character to watch his love interest die? Maybe I’m evil; I don’t know (he jokes). Placing him in a care home, surrounded by those at the end of their lives, felt like the perfect mirror. His body never changes, but the world around him does. That contrast lets me explore something rarely seen in queer fiction: the emotional toll of aging—or in Victor’s case, never aging—while still carrying all those hidden histories forward.

At the same time, while I was writing This Is Not a Vampire Story, I was also exploring Buddhism as a practice, and the question of what death really is became central to the novel. From a Buddhist perspective, death is simply a transition, not an ending. That understanding helped shape the novel’s heart. For Victor, too, there comes a shift in how he views mortality: what once seemed terrifying begins to look like release, or even acceptance. It’s a quiet but profound evolution.

I never set out to reclaim gothic tropes or narrative, though in writing about a vampire (and, as you state, I never once use the word “vampire” in the story), it’s difficult to avoid them. Classic gothic stories often coded queer desire as monstrous or doomed. For Victor, I needed something different. He’s not a monster, he’s a queer man navigating the weight of time.

Queer representation is at the heart of your work, but your commitment to inclusivity extends even further. In The Sound of You, Jun-ho Lee, who is half-Korean, is Deaf. As someone who also writes characters with disabilities, I understand how vital it is to portray them with respect and depth, showing that people of all experiences have desires, ambitions, and frustrations. It’s disheartening to see stories where characters are “othered,” with queerness, race or disability reduced to little more than a device for melodrama, stripped of nuance or authenticity.

I do want to acknowledge that many Deaf individuals, particularly those who identify as part of the Deaf community, don’t consider themselves disabled. Instead, they see Deafness as a rich cultural and linguistic identity, primarily through the use of sign language, not as a deficit or impairment.

With Jun, you’ve created a deeply nuanced character whose Deafness is not a limitation, but an integral part of his identity, as is his experience as a biracial person. His character feels authentic and fully realized, not defined by disability but shaped by the richness of his lived experiences. Owen, our love interest, adapts, and with time, communicating with Jun becomes second nature.

What inspired you to write a Deaf character who is also biracial, and was it tricky putting yourself in Jun’s head? What advice would you offer writers who want to respectfully and meaningfully include characters with disabilities in their work, highlighting not just challenges, but also the fullness of their lives, identities, and the importance of acceptance over the trope of overcoming differences?

The inspiration for Jun really came from two places in my life that converged. The first was a newfound love of K-dramas, especially Korean BL dramas. They can be a little silly in terms of plot, but at their core, they almost always carry this deep thread of hope. That sense of hopefulness was something I wanted to weave into The Sound of You.

Secondly, as a child, I had a very good Deaf friend. We lost touch over the years, but what stayed with me was his fierce independence and the way his Deafness wasn’t something that defined him negatively. It was just part of who he was.

That memory became a touchstone when I began shaping Jun. His Deafness is not a deficit, but an integral piece of his identity, alongside his biracial heritage. He’s not “overcoming” anything; he’s living fully as himself.

Was it tricky to put myself in his head? Yes, because I wanted to do it respectfully and with care. But I also approached it the same way I do with any character: by grounding him in humanity first. For writers looking to include characters with disabilities, I’d say not to write them as challenges to be overcome, and not to make their identity the whole story. Do your research, but more importantly, give them the same depth, contradictions, and vitality you’d give any character.

From Dublin to Belfast, the two books in your Runaway Bay series are set against the rich and evocative backdrop of Ireland, with each installment weaving the country’s landscapes, culture, and history into its narrative. In fact, Ireland features prominently throughout all your work. How has your Irish heritage shaped your approach to storytelling? Do you find that Ireland—its history, landscapes, and cultural sensibilities—naturally influences the settings you choose and the characters you create?

Ireland has a history of producing writers, so it must be in my blood! You can’t turn around here without tripping over a poet, playwright, or just someone spinning a good yarn in the pub. Sometimes I think storytelling is baked into the Irish culture. I say all that in jest, but maybe there’s some truth to it.

There’s also truth in that old advice to “write what you know.” Although I’ve lived in London, Leeds, and for a short time in Oklahoma, Ireland is my home first and foremost. It shaped me as much as it shapes my storytelling. So whether I’m writing a contemporary YA novel set in Dublin or a Gothic-esque vampire story, that heritage is always there. I’m influenced by what I see. I can only hope that people understand me when they read my Irish-isms!

If you had the chance to become one of your characters, which one would you choose and why? What specific qualities, experiences or inner conflicts of this character resonate with you personally? How do they reflect your worldview, values, or perhaps even parts of yourself that you don’t often express? What makes this character stand out to you above the others you’ve created? Would you say this character reveals traces of yourself more clearly than the rest, perhaps a subtle instance of “author slippage” showing through?

That’s a tricky question because the truth is I couldn’t choose just one. Every character I write carries a piece of me. Or maybe it’s the other way around, and I carry a piece of them. Either way, I’m already all of them in some way.

There isn’t a single character I’d want to be more than the others, because writing them is already my way of inhabiting them. I get to live through their fears, joys, mistakes, and triumphs.

There’s almost certainly plenty of “author slippage” running through my books, but it’s not confined to any one character. They’re all reflections of me in some way. I’m Victor as much as I am Amaral. Owen is as much me as I am Jun-ho. As a writer, I don’t think there’s any avoiding that.

What book(s) are you currently devouring? Do you have a preferred genre or are you quite diverse in your reading preferences?

My TBR pile is enormous (whose isn’t?!), but at the minute, I’m reading some Zen Buddhist texts as I further my explorations into the practice. And in terms of fiction, I’ve just finished Small Things Like These by Claire Keegan, a fellow Irish writer. It was my first Keegan story, and I wanted to see what the fuss was all about.

I do read mostly queer fiction when I can, but not to the exclusion of all others. I have an eclectic taste in fiction almost as much as I do in music (which, if you ask my husband, simply means “weird”!). I’m also reading some non-fiction textbooks that are helping to lay the foundations for my next novel. To me, “write what you know” means “study it first until you know it, then write.”

What does the future hold for author Simon Doyle? Are there plans to continue the Runaway Bay series? Maybe a desire to explore another gothic-inspired gay paranormal romance novel? “This Is Not A Werewolf Story,” perhaps? (We can workshop this.)

I always go where the story leads. I’ve announced that I won’t be continuing the Runaway Bay series. After eleven (honestly!) distinct attempts at Runaway Ridge (what would have been book 3 in the series), I had to accept that it was a story that refused to be told. Denis and Oliver from book 1, and Caleb and Kai from book 2, will live out their days at Runaway Bay without new arrivals to disturb them. I was young and naïve when I started that series, and my craft has changed so much since then.

As for “This is Not a Werewolf Story,” I originally had a plan for more “This is not a…” stories, and my editor was pushing for an alien story. But I find that when I’m pushed in a certain direction, my brain refuses to go there. It needs to journey on its own in order to feel free enough to write. But that’s not to say I won’t go there one day.

Right now, I’m working on a few very disparate stories simultaneously. My process is basically to throw stories at the wall and see what sticks. It’s messy, but it’s also where the magic happens, because when something does stick, I know I’ve found the one worth chasing. I try not to limit myself to genre beyond the basics: there’ll be love, and there’ll be hurt. But don’t be alarmed if my next novel is set in 16th-century Ireland—or the 26th Century!

Thanks so much, Simon, for sharing your journey and thoughts on your work in Gay/Queer Paranormal and YA Romance. It was a pleasure hearing about what drives you as an author. Can’t wait to see where your projects go next, and I’m wishing you all the best moving forward!

For more information about this author, follow Simon Doyle on Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, or visit his Website. To purchase his work head to Barnes & Noble, Indigo, or check out his Amazon Author Page.

 

 

BOOK REVIEW: GOTHIC REVIVAL BY MICHAEL MULLIN

“It was clear he wanted them all to be in some Gothic story of his creation, but would he really take it to that level?Michael Mullin, Gothic Revival

MICHAEL Mullin’s Gothic Revival is a cerebral and deliciously atmospheric thriller that skillfully intertwines homage to classic Gothic literature with a slow-burning, psychological narrative. Set in an isolated lakeside villa, the novel reunites five former MFA classmates—Chris, Anne, Fiona, Lauren, and Eric—for what begins as a nostalgic creative writing retreat. However, beneath the surface of literary fun lies a sinister current of manipulation, long-buried resentments, and emotional trauma. The retreat quickly devolves from an artistic gathering into a haunting confrontation with the past, as the characters grapple with eerie visions and unravelling relationships.

Gothic Revival draws inspiration from the famous summer of 1816 at Villa Diodati near Lake Geneva, where Lord Byron, Mary Shelley, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and John Polidori—along with Mary’s stepsister (and Byron’s brief lover), Claire Clairmont—were confined indoors due to the unusually rainy and stormy “Year Without a Summer” as it has come to be known.

To pass the time, Byron proposed a ghost story writing contest, which resulted in his poem “Darkness,” Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, and Polidori’s The Vampyre. Byron also wrote a fragment of a vampire horror story that was never completed, known as “Fragment of a Novel.” These works are pioneering benchmarks of Gothic horror and vampire literature, with some, like Shelley’s, also being considered early Science Fiction. Three great films about that summer at Villa Diodati are Ken Russell’s Gothic (1986), Ivan Passer’s Haunted Summer (1988), based on the book of the same name by Anne Edwards, and Haifaa al-Mansour’s Mary Shelley (2017). 

Mullin’s modern interpretation draws both structural and thematic parallels to the Romantic era, while crafting a narrative rooted in the emotional and psychological complexities of contemporary life. The plot follows Eric, a charismatic and manipulative screenwriter, who orchestrates the retreat under the pretense of sparking literary inspiration. He challenges each guest to write a ghost story during their stay. Yet the true ghost stories emerge not from fiction but from memory, trauma, and regret.

As the characters begin to write and reflect, personal tensions and past betrayals rise to the surface. Mullin allows these dynamics to unfold gradually, using a shifting point-of-view structure to immerse the reader in each character’s internal world. Through this lens, the seemingly innocent reunion turns dark, revealing layers of emotional depth, long-held secrets, and psychological instability (the best kind for a Gothic thriller!).

One of the novel’s most compelling elements is its rich character development. Mullin mirrors each of his characters after the Romantic literary figures mentioned above, deepening the meta-literary resonance. Chris and Anne, a married couple struggling with emotional disconnection, evoke Percy and Mary Shelley. The free-spirited Fiona, a clairvoyant, echoes Claire Clairmont, while Lauren, a PhD in Victorian history, mimics the erudite nature of Polidori. Eric, the orchestrator of the retreat, channels Lord Byron: charming, enigmatic, and ultimately cruel. Or, as Lady Caroline Lamb called Byron, “Mad, bad, and dangerous to know!”

A humiliating graduation prank Eric once played on Chris casts a long shadow over the group, poisoning the dynamic and adding depth to the story’s psychological stakes.

The suspense in Gothic Revival is slow-building but effective. Mullin masterfully manipulates the narrative perspective to obscure and reveal just enough to keep the reader questioning what is real. Ghostly apparitions, mysterious noises, and a cryptic housekeeper all add to the atmosphere, but the true horror lies in the emotional and psychological toll on the characters.

The house itself becomes a character, an eerie, ivy-covered estate that seems to absorb the tension within its walls. Its dark hallways, reflective surfaces, and looming presence echo traditional gothic settings while anchoring the story firmly in the modern age. It’s Collinwood Mansion from TV’s Dark Shadows or the Usher House in Edgar Allan Poe’s The Fall of the House of Usher. It’s so good! 

Rather than retell gothic classics, Mullin embeds his narrative with layered literary references. From Frankenstein to Dracula to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, these allusions enrich the reading experience, especially for literary enthusiasts like me. Assigning a character a Romantic-era counterpart adds a clever metafictional dimension to the story. Yes, some readers may find these references luxuriant without prior familiarity with the period or genre, though nothing is incoherent. The intertextuality is not simply decorative; it serves as a thematic foundation that explores creativity, identity, and the echoes of both personal and literary histories. This element is essential to the narrative, and I would argue it aligns precisely with Mullin’s textual and thematic goals for his novel.

Is that presumptuous to say? Maybe, but I stand by it.

The novel explores the price of ambition, the fragility of memory, and the emotional cost of artistic legacy. It feels intimate, tense, and intellectually resonant, which is very much in the style of 19th-century Gothic literature.

The pacing of the novel is intentionally measured, which may make the first half seem slow to some readers. However, I promise you, if you appreciate psychological nuance and character depth you will find the buildup rewarding. The final act delivers a series of satisfying and unexpected twists, tying the narrative threads together in a way that honours both its gothic roots and its modern psychoanalytic sensibility.

The supernatural elements remain understated throughout, never fully explained, never entirely dismissed, leaving readers in a murky space between skepticism and belief, much like the characters themselves. 

Michael Mullin’s Gothic Revival is a haunting meditation on memory, betrayal, and the darker sides of creativity. It delivers a rich, multilayered experience of what I call “emotional deconstruction.” Mullin has crafted a modern gothic story that respects the Gothic genre’s past while offering a compelling vision of its future; it’s moody, chilling, and introspective. Not only did I read it, but I got my dad a copy last XMAS! He loved it!

Gothic Revival is available for purchase at indigoamazon.ca, and amazon.com.

For more information about this author, follow Michael Mullin on InstagramFacebookBluesky, or visit his Website.

It’s Happening Again! Haunted Hearts: Season of the Witch

HAUNTED HEARTS: SEASON OF THE WITCH – EVERYONE DESERVES TO BE SPELLBOUND!

 

HAUNTED HEARTS: SEASON OF THE WITCH IS AN OWN-VOICES GAY PARANORMAL ROMANCE SERIES.

This is the second season of Haunted Hearts, where last year we explored romance between men and the things that go BOO! in the night. This time, it’s the witches’ turn to cast a spell on our readers. Six authors from last year have returned—including me—and we’re thrilled to welcome five new writers from around the world.

Join us on our romantic journeys with eleven books from some of your favourite gay and queer male authors! Every page promises a taste of love, a touch of magic, and the danger of wanting more.

There’s a range of engaging tropes and spice levels between us, along with a diverse spectrum of supernatural elements within each narrative. From Urban Fantasy to Historical Romance to Modern Gothic/Horror, these Own-Voice authors bring their distinct perspectives to the Gay Paranormal Romance genre. Each book is a standalone but why not read them all?

Here are the 11 books in the Haunted Hearts: Season of the Witch series, with author links, in the order they will be released beginning October 1st and ending on the 31st. And we all know what magical day that is!

Memories in BoneJ.P. Jackson
Heart of the Wren Glenn Quigley
Currents of the HeartM.D. Neu
I Will Always Find You – Ryan Lawrence (THAT’S ME!)
A Tall Cup Of JoeMatti McLean
Jade Lion and the Witch BoyCD Rachels
Heart Shaped WreckageShane K. Morton
The Bairwick WitchesEric David Roman
Andalusia DogsChristian Baines
Grayson’s Magical MishapsKevin Klehr
RiftwitchTal Frost

I’ve previously interviewed four of the contributing authors for my BLOG: J.P. Jackson, Eric David Roman, Tal Frost, and Christian Baines. Want to get to know the minds behind their magic? Just click the link in their name and have a read.

Now, let’s take a look at my entry, I WILL ALWAYS FIND YOU, including the awesome cover designed by Samrat Acharjee–with input from yours truly, of course. Logo created by our own Glenn Quigley (who has also graciously contributed artwork to both my HH novels).

HOW FAR WOULD YOU GO TO DEFY FATE FOR TRUE LOVE?

In the shadow of a restless Mount Vesuvius, a grieving Romani witch casts a vengeful spell—one that may cost him his life. At the edge of death, he dares to call out across the veil, a final plea for help.

And something primordial, a magic older than the gods, answers.

Days before the destruction of ancient Pompeii, a grand love is devastated by bigotry and fear within the walls of the great city. But where the Roman gods offer silence, an older, arcane force offers the despondent witch hope: to live and love again, reborn into new eras, new bodies, an eternal search for the soul of the man he lost.

Yet the Wheel of Destiny, that enigmatic celestial force, spins cruelly; it does not take kindly to those who dare to circumvent their fate. From ancient times to modern-day Toronto, Canada, this is the story of a true love that will not be denied by time, fate or death. However, with every reunion comes risk: loss, madness, as well as dark, eldritch forces that seek to do the lovers harm. Destiny may bend, but it does not break without consequence.

I WILL ALWAYS FIND YOU will be released on October 7th, just in time for Halloween, on Amazon as an EBOOK and (soon) in PAPERBACK. While this novel is a stand-alone, it features characters tied to The Night Belongs To Lovers—my first Haunted Hearts book—so reading that story first will enrich your experience and double your pleasure! If you haven’t yet read the immortal love story of Olympius and Coriolanus (Corey), I strongly encourage you to. You won’t be sorry—promise!

PREORDER my book now on AMAZON! Also, check out and PREORDER any or all of the entire Haunted Hearts series on AMAZON!

Haunted Hearts – Everyone Deserves To Be Spellbound!
Haunted Hearts is an Own-Voices Paranormal Romance Series about the bewitching powers that tempt the heart. In a world of spells and secrets, love is the most seductive magic. And the most dangerous!

Queering the Male Witch: Julien Mayfair in Anne Rice’s The Witching Hour

As I’ve previously mentioned, my three favourite characters in literary fiction are Dracula, Louis de Pointe du Lac, and Julien Mayfair. I’ve already delved into the intriguing worlds of Dracula and Louis, with a queer theory focus; now it’s time to turn my attention to Julien, especially in light of the upcoming, stunningly illustrated hardcover of Anne Rice’s The Witching Hour from Books Illustrated Ltd. 

The Witching Hour by Anne Rice from Books Illustrated (2026)

IN Interview with the Vampire, Anne Rice crafted a narrative that deeply explores the fundamental aspects of the human condition: suffering, morality, identity, loneliness, and the search for meaning. Louis, the novel’s soulful narrator, is the perfect embodiment of this philosophical exploration. Unlike his immortal maker Lestat, who embraces vampirism, Louis remains haunted by his lingering humanity. His existential crisis becomes the lens through which Rice examines what it truly means to be human, even when one is forever outside of humanity, othered, though bound to exist among them.

Julien Mayfair from Rice’s 1990 novel, The Witching Hour, beautifully merges Louis’ profound compassion for the human spirit with Lestat’s fierce passion for physicality and the pleasures of the mortal realm. Julien wields influence in both the mundane world—through wealth, charm, and intellect—and the metaphysical realm—through the powers of mind and spirit. Yet, unlike Rice’s vampires, he is bound by mortality; he must claim his place in the world by embracing all it has to offer within a single lifetime.

Perhaps it’s this stark disconnection from the concept of immortality that makes Julien’s psyche so captivating and his character arc stand out in such a remarkable way compared to others. Well, at least to me.

The Witching Hour explores the gothic and supernatural through the lens of generational trauma, power, and identity in the Mayfair family, a dynasty of witches bound to a mysterious, powerful, and sensual spirit named Lasher. Among the many complex characters that populate Rice’s expansive narrative, Julien Mayfair stands out not only as, arguably, the most powerful Mayfair witch but also as a queer figure who subverts gendered norms of magic, lineage, and desire.

Julien Mayfair by Bruno Vergauwen (from the Books Illustrated hardcover edition of Anne Rice’s The Witching Hour)

As the only male witch in a matrilineal line of female witches, Julien’s birth marks a rupture in the family’s tradition; paradoxically, it’s this break from convention that grants him unprecedented power.

His bisexuality, his freedom in expressing it, especially in a time of repression and social prejudice, and his erotic relationship with Lasher further position him as a liminal figure. And though it must be noted that pretty much all the witches bang Lasher at some point, not all share the same depth of intensity or intimacy in their relationships with him. 

The Mayfair legacy includes an inheritance of preternatural gifts. Power is passed from mother to daughter. Into this system, Julien Mayfair is born, a male child who inherits and exceeds the powers traditionally granted to female heirs. This inversion of the expected order signals more than just an anomaly: it represents a queering of the familial and magical structure.

In queer theory (a favourite topic of mine), such disruptions of normative frameworks, be they of gender, sexuality, or lineage, are critical moments of analysis. Julien’s very existence destabilizes the supposed naturalness of gender roles within magical inheritance. His birth “breaks” the line, yet this rupture leads to a surge in power, suggesting that the rigidity of tradition has perhaps been a limitation rather than a strength.

Julien’s power is not simply equal to that of the female Mayfairs of his time: it’s greater. He communicates with Lasher more clearly, commanding respect along with the expected desire. While Lasher does not explicitly express fear toward Julien, their complex relationship suggests a dynamic that involves a level of wariness on Lasher’s part.

A young Julien Mayfair (before his hair turned prematurely white.)

Julien was initially outside Lasher’s favour due to a prior oath to the first Mayfair witch not to “smile upon” male descendants. Despite this, Julien’s witch abilities and his willingness to engage with Lasher, both sexually and through allowing Lasher to possess his body, indicate a certain level of mutual influence and manipulation. This interaction is part of Lasher’s broader plan to produce stronger witches through incestuous unions within the Mayfair family, aiming to eventually be reborn in a powerful physical form.

Julien’s unexpected power offers a chance to infuse the genetic line with unprecedented strength and potency, which Lasher comes to see. Case in point: Mary Beth, Julien’s daughter/niece. A powerful witch not seen among the Mayfair women in some time; she potentially rivals her father in power.

This superiority, rooted in his male identity, brings with it both privilege and curse. In this sense, Rice seems to be playing with the idea of patriarchal dominance while simultaneously undermining it: Julien’s power is exceptional because it deviates from tradition, not because it conforms to patriarchal standards. The irony is that his masculinity—his intrusion into a female space—makes him queer within his own lineage. What’s also compelling about Julien is that he never shies away from, nor disdains, his more feminine traits. All is a tool for power over others, either through charm, seduction, or manipulation.

Rice never shied away from queer subtext and subversion, and Julien Mayfair is a prime example of this commitment. Julien’s bisexuality, while not the central focus of his storyline, is unmistakably present and deeply tied to his enigmatic persona. His relationships with women and men (including his own family members!) are often marked by power dynamics that reflect his commanding presence as a witch and patriarchal figure.

One could say that Julien suffers from an acute sense of entitlement, perhaps even narcissism, and yet, paradoxically, these flaws somehow make him all the more, if not endearing, magnetic. Men and women are drawn to him.

You could say that Julien’s bisexuality mirrors his broader identity; he’s neither a traditional witch nor a complete outsider. His function within the narrative is not to fit into any singular role or (yes, I’m going to say it) position. From a queer theoretical perspective, his sexual fluidity becomes a metaphor for his magical and familial fluidity. His power emerges not from fixed roles but from his ability to exist in and traverse multiple categories.

Julien’s relationship with Lasher, the spirit bound to the Mayfair line, is perhaps the most telling aspect of his queerness. The connection between Julien and Lasher is deeply intimate and unmistakably erotic. Yet, unlike most of the witches who came before him, this man is not so easily seduced by the spirit, never readily willing to surrender his agency for romance or sex. Julien’s ego is his shield, sometimes his weapon, against the control and/or influence of others, including Lasher.

Rice imbues their interactions with a sensual charge, blurring the boundaries between dominance and submission, master and servant, creator and created. Julien seemingly commands Lasher fully, yet their bond is symbiotic and deeply entangled in emotional and spiritual need.  

In queer theory, the interplay of power, desire, and identity is central. Julien and Lasher’s relationship embodies a homoerotic tension that transcends traditional romantic and sexual paradigms. Lasher’s desire to be made flesh, eventually realized through later generations, can be seen as an allegory for forbidden or suppressed desire seeking embodiment. Julien, as one who clearly understands Lasher and yet willfully manipulates him, becomes both object and subject of the spirit’s desire made manifest.

Moreover, Lasher becomes a projection of Julien’s own internal contradictions; he reflects Julien’s power, ambition, and longing, but also his alienation. Lasher’s fixation on the Mayfairs is driven as much by possession and selfish desire as by connection and love. One could say the exact same thing about Julien regarding his relationship to pretty much anyone he brings into his life, into his web of influence.

Their relationship is emblematic of the queer experience: intense, complex, and often existing outside of heteronormative structures of love or family. Both are preternatural, yet each yearns for a distinctly human connection and way of being. And like much in life, things get messy; they have the power to use and care, act and react, destroy and enliven, love and hate. And they embrace it all.

Only when Mary Beth’s true power emerges and age begins to affect him does Julien’s once-immutable hold over Lasher wane. A strong example of this shift is the burning of his autobiography by Mary Beth, who by this point had supplanted her father/uncle as Lasher’s primary focus. Julien could neither command nor persuade Lasher to aid him. And though he ultimately used his own telekinetic power against Mary Beth—briefly frightening and halting her—it was no longer strong enough to stop her. Julien, a mortal, had finally been diminished by age.

Through the character of Julien Mayfair in her novel, The Witching Hour, Rice crafts a narrative that queers the very idea of legacy and inheritance. His story is not just about preternatural power; it’s about the subversion of norms and the potency that lies in deviation. In doing so, Julien Mayfair becomes not only arguably the most powerful Mayfair witch but also one of Rice’s most profoundly queer and captivating creations.

Review: This is Not A Vampire Story By Simon Doyle.

“And then there was blessed silence. I swam in the darkness and there was nothing, no sound to injure me. Not even my heartbeat.” – Simon Doyle, This is Not A Vampire Story

SIMON Doyle’s This is Not a Vampire Story is a novel that transcends genre expectations while still embracing the emotional and aesthetic traditions of Gothic literature. Despite its provocative title, the book does engage with the vampire mythos, not through horror or bloodlust, but by exploring themes of queer desire, memory, and loss.

Victor Callahan is a vampire trapped in the form of a seventeen-year-old. Rather than a figure of terror, he becomes a vessel for quiet reflection. The story unfolds as a restrained and intimate exploration of love—both hidden and openly expressed, romantic and platonic—of grief that lingers beyond time, and of identities shaped by repression, secrecy, and longing.

The pairing of queerness and Gothic has long literary roots. From Sheridan Le Fanu’s Carmilla to Anne Rice’s Interview with the Vampire, the vampire has often functioned as a metaphor for otherness, forbidden desire, and queer identity. In This is Not a Vampire Story, Doyle draws on this tradition. However, instead of emphasizing the monstrous or eroticized aspects of the vampire, he uses Victor’s immortality as a metaphor for queer loneliness and the enduring trauma of lost love.

Set partly in mid-century (1949 onward) Ireland, a time and place marked by the criminalization and stigma of homosexuality, the novel chronicles Victor’s relationship with James O’Carroll, a mortal. Their love exists under constant threat, hidden from society, and is ultimately shattered by forces beyond their control. The tragedy of their separation isn’t just a romantic loss; it becomes a symbol of the many queer love stories throughout history that were silenced or erased.

[For more on this topic, check out Loving: A Photographic History of Men in Love, 1850s to 1950s by Hugh Nini & Neal Treadwell (Oct 2020)]

This is Not a Vampire Story is told in first-person. Structurally, it alternates between past and present, with Victor now living at Lakeshore Manor, an elder care facility in 2018. These alternating timelines serve to emphasize how the past continues to haunt the present, not just for Victor, but also for the people around him. In classic Gothic fashion, time does not move cleanly forward. Instead, it loops and bleeds into itself. The present is filled with ghosts of the past—not literal ones, but the lingering effects of love, regret, and secrets.

Victor cannot forget James, nor can he live fully in the present. His immortality becomes a prolonged grief, an extended metaphor for the queer experience of living with memory in a society that has demanded forgetting.

Doyle’s approach to the Gothic is subtle; it’s Gothic without gore. He builds atmosphere through tone, setting, and emotional weight. The coastal Irish landscape is windswept and lonely. The interiors of Lakeshore Manor are quiet, filled with shadows and empty corridors. Characters whisper more than they shout. The horror here is far more internal than external, rooted in memory and repression rather than outside threats of blood lust and supernatural savagery.

This emotional restraint regarding overt supernatural elements enables Doyle to concentrate on character development and thematic depth. The novel particularly explores how queer individuals experience time, conceal love, preserve memory, and how trauma, once experienced, stubbornly lingers. The Gothic tradition’s intrigue with secrets, madness, and the uncanny is redirected to focus on queer inner experiences.

What makes Doyle’s novel especially compelling is that it treats queerness not merely as a romantic subplot, but as a lens through which to explore human relationships more broadly. Secondary characters, particularly Gloria, a night nurse with her own complicated past, and James’ now-elderly friends, are given space to reflect on their relationships, losses, and moral failures.

By positioning Victor in a care home, Doyle also touches on a theme rarely addressed in vampire fiction: queer aging. Though Victor’s body does not age, the world around him does. His queerness, like his vampirism, separates him from others, especially in a space designed for those nearing the end of (human) life. Here, Doyle seems to ask: What does it mean to outlive the person or people you love? What does it mean to remember what others have forgotten or were never allowed to know?

Though its title states otherwise, This is Not a Vampire Story is very much a vampire story, one told through a queer, Gothic, and profoundly human lens. Well, perhaps that statement is somewhat misleading. This novel is a story about immortality/agelessness and its complex, beautiful and tragic relationship to mortality seen through the eyes of a vampire.

Doyle has crafted a novel that uses the conventions of the Gothic not for shock or spectacle, but for emotional truth. His creations do not dazzle; they grieve. They do not stalk; they remember. In doing so, Doyle aligns the vampire not with monstrosity, but with the enduring ache of a (queer) love that must be hidden, protected, and finally mourned.

Maybe the true monster is not the vampire, but time itself.

Simon Doyle’s This is Not a Vampire Story is not a horror novel. It’s a quiet, poetic narrative of reflection, a love letter to memory, if you will; it’s a compassionate meditation on how the past (inevitably?) shapes who we are. An evocative, poignant work, Mr. Doyle.

Lastly, I’m completely obsessed with the one cover: the haunting moon, the moody blue/black colouring, the ship (a nod to Bram Stoker’s “The Demeter” from Dracula), and the near-glowing Gothic script. I want this as a poster.

This is Not A Vampire Story is available for purchase at indigo, amazon.ca, and amazon.com.

For more information about this author, follow Simon Doyle on Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, or visit his Website.