INTERVIEW WITH GAY/QUEER HISTORICAL ROMANCE AUTHOR GLENN QUIGLEY

Glenn Quigley: “Coming from an Own-Voice perspective means I can draw from lived experience, not just from what I’ve read online. My characters can be people, not catchphrases.”

GLENN Quigley is an author and artist originally from Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland, now living in Lisburn, Northern Ireland, with his husband, Mark. His debut novel, The Moth and Moon, was published in 2018 by Ninestar Press, marking the beginning of a rich and compelling literary career that emphasizes showcasing gay/queer narratives. [Self-Portrait (in above image) by Glenn Quigley.]

Since then, Glenn has released an impressive lineup of novels, including The Lion Lies Waiting, We Cry The Sea, These Young Wolves: The Knights of Blackrabbit (Book One), followed by its sequel, The Star We Sail By: The Knights of Blackrabbit (Book Two), and Teacup Promises. He is also the author of  Curse of the Stag’s Eye and Heart of the Wren—part of the own-voice gay paranormal romance series, Haunted Hearts [That I am also a part of—PLUG!].

His shorter works include the poignant short story Use as Wallpaper (Ninestar Press) and the festive holiday novella The Great Santa Showdown, published by JMS Books and featured in the 2023 Top Ten Gay Fiction anthology.

In addition to his writing, Glenn is a talented portrait artist working in acrylics and watercolours. He also lends his creative talents to the popular brand themoodybear.com as a designer. In 2022, he created a portrait series inspired by the characters from The Moth and Moon trilogy. This collection was exhibited at the Kallio Library in Finland and showcased at a gay cultural event in Estonia.

In this interview, Glenn and I discuss various topics, including the importance of diverse body types in romance fiction, his passion for nautical-themed narratives, and the impact of writing from an Own-Voice perspective.

My review of Glenn Quigley’s Haunted Hearts novel, Curse of the Stag’s Eye, can be found in an earlier blog post. 

When you reflect on the beginnings of your writing, both as a personal outlet for creative expression and as a step toward professional goals, who or what stands out as your greatest source of inspiration? At what moment did you realize it was time to move beyond writing for yourself and enter the daunting world of publishing? How do you navigate the vulnerability and anxiety that can come with sharing your work with a wider, global audience?

I wrote my first novel the year I dropped out of a college course as an adult student. I was 38 or 39, and I’d gone back to college to get a proper qualification in graphic design. The first year was fine because it was at an art college, but the second year was more formal, and I hated it immediately—so I left.

Suddenly, I had a whole year ahead of me with nothing planned (apart from my day job), and I felt a crushing need to have something to show for it, since I wasn’t going to get the qualification I’d wanted.

I’d been writing on and off since I was a kid—just little snippets of things, here and there. My mother would often ask me if I’d “done any writing lately.” One day, I sat down and told myself I was going to write a short story. That was it. A good, proper, solid short story. With a beginning, middle, and end. I worked out what it was about, and I wrote it over the course of a few weeks. Once it was done, I wondered if I could maybe, possibly expand it into a novel. Could I? Ah, sure, why not? I’d give it a go, and if it didn’t work, nobody ever needed to know.

So I tried. And it worked. And that novel became The Moth and Moon. I showed it to a friend who I knew would be honest with me, and he said he liked it. Then I wondered if I could get it published. I don’t remember exactly why I thought that, but I started looking into agents and publishers. I knew nothing whatsoever about the publishing industry—which, in hindsight, was probably a good thing, since I didn’t know enough to be discouraged.

Anyway, within a few months, the book was (and still is) published by NineStar Press. I hadn’t told anyone I was trying to get it published. In fact, I hadn’t even told anyone (except for that one friend) that I’d written a book, so everyone was surprised—especially my now-husband.

I’m not sure how I got over the anxiety that comes with putting your work out in the world. I suppose I often think about how many huge, critically acclaimed bestsellers I’ve read and hated, and try to remember that there will always be someone who loves and someone who hates my work. That’s just human nature. Besides, would you rather have published a book that some people don’t like or not have published a book at all?

What is it about the romance genre, particularly when it comes to relationships between men, that excites and inspires you? Is it as basic as you being a gay man simply wanting to tell gay stories? How much do your own experiences with love and relationships influence the way you write romance in your fiction? 

I love the comfort of a romance, I suppose. The knowledge that things will work out in the end. And it’s nice to showcase fuller-figured men in romance, as we’re often overlooked.

Do gay love stories offer something inherently different from traditional heterosexual romances? Should they be approached from a distinct perspective to authentically reflect the queer or same-sex experience, rather than simply feeling like a heterosexual story with the genders swapped?

They absolutely do need to be approached differently, and I think you can often tell when they’re just gender swapped straight romances. The dynamics between two men is different than between a man and a woman, I think. Socially, politically, sexually, etc.

There’s an honesty (often a brutal, self-deprecating honesty) that comes from a gay man writing about gay men (or any LGBTQ+ person writing about their own experiences) that’s hard to quantify and harder to authentically replicate if you don’t have that lived experience. (I’m not saying that everyone should only write characters that match them one-to-one, of course. That would be insane. There’s room for everyone.) [Male Nude (in above image) by Glenn Quigley.]

Gay/queer romance, particularly M/M, can sometimes fall into formulaic tropes or even veer into fetishization. Your work often includes masculine, hirsute, mature men who may identify in gay culture as bears, otters, and even daddies. How do you ensure emotional honesty and depth in your storytelling so that these narratives feel genuine rather than contrived? Do you find that, as a gay author, writing from an Own-Voices perspective gives you a unique advantage in achieving that authenticity?

I approach them as characters first and labels second. If you start from “Okay, this character is a “twink” or “this character is a bear,” then you run the risk of falling headfirst into stereotypes, and it can be harder to break out and find room for the character to move and grow. Start with them as people first, and then see how their identity fits in and informs their decisions.

Coming from an Own-Voice perspective means I can draw from lived experience, not just from what I’ve read online. My characters can be people, not catchphrases.

Speaking more on daddies, otters, and bears—oh my! Your stories, as mentioned above, often center on men who bring lived experience and emotional nuance to queer romance. These are characters whose journeys unfold beyond youth, coming out, and first love as they navigate gay/queer desire, identity, and vulnerability. Are you particularly drawn to writing romance from the perspective of older or more experienced gay characters, as opposed to younger or coming-of-age protagonists? What is it about this stage of life—or this type of character—that resonates so strongly with you and influences how you navigate the landscape of queer romance? Are stories centred on older gay men, like yourself, underrepresented in queer romance and fiction more broadly?

I suppose it’s because I’m middle-aged, so I want to see more characters that I can more easily relate to. And I’ve always been attracted to older men, so that’s definitely part of it too. Plus, so many gay stories focus on coming out and coming-of-age stuff that writing about older, more settled characters is a way to stand out from the crowd and add something new to the mix. And older gay male characters are definitely underrepresented in fiction, especially romance. They may crop up as the substitute father figure, or cuddly uncle, or whatever, but how many chubby daddies get to be the protagonist?!

 In many of your novels, particularly The Moth and Moon, The Lion Lies Waiting, and We Cry the Sea, nautical themes and seafaring life play a central role, not just as setting but as emotional landscape. Wind, water, solitude, salt, and distance create a vivid atmosphere that carries emotional weight, evoking freedom, isolation, danger, and even rebirth. How do these themes serve your characters or shape their emotional journeys? How do you use these sensory details to enrich the romance or tension in your stories? Is there a personal connection?

I love the sea, I always have. (Can I swim? No. But can I sail? Also, no.) So, when building a world, I often use the sea as a sort of “happy place” to start from. With The Moth and Moon, the very earliest version had the story set on the coast of Cornwall in the UK. However, I quickly realized that the remote, isolated setting of a tiny island would be a far better reflection of the main character’s loneliness and sense of being isolated from his community. Plus, having it be a small island was a contrast to his physical size. (Robin Shipp, the protagonist of The Moth and Moon, is the tallest man on the island, as well as being a big, heavy guy.)

Given that these books are set in an alt-history 18th century, the sea holds a lot of promise for exploration and adventure. We’ve all seen plenty of films and books with swashbuckling action and wistful gazes from seashores, so I think a nautical setting creates an instant mood in the reader’s mind.

Your storytelling beautifully blends atmospheric, well-researched historical detail with modern romance. Could you describe your process for weaving history and lore into your fiction?

While I often read for research, I’m mainly a visual learner, so I watch a lot of documentaries to nail down the facts of a given topic as best I can. Once I’ve got a fairly good grip on something, it gives me a basis from which to expand and twist. (And once I’m done, I immediately forget everything I’ve learned, which is why I make copious notes.)

The world of The Moth and Moon is historical fantasy, which means I’ve got room to manoeuvre and change things to suit my needs. Knowingly introducing anachronistic elements is a good way to give a little clue and nod to the reader to say, “This is the past, but it isn’t our past.” I think of things like the bathrooms in The Moth and Moon and the hot water pipes all over the town of Port Knot in the Knights of Blackrabbit series.

Paranormal fiction doesn’t always need explicit horror to be impactful. With your Haunted Hearts series novels, Curse of the Stag’s Eye and your recently released Heart of the Wren, what do you think makes a paranormal story—whether it’s romance, adventure, drama, or another genre—resonate emotionally with readers beyond the scares? Does working within the supernatural genre change how you approach your writing? How does it compare to writing straightforward historical fiction, like your Knights of Blackrabbit series (These Young Wolves and The Star We Sail By), or a rom-com such as your holiday novella The Great Santa Showdown?

I approach all my stories from the same starting point. I come up with characters that I think work well together, I flesh out their story arcs as best I can, and then I see how the plot can unfold to best tell their story. The characters often morph as I figure out what the actual plot is, as each part of the story naturally informs every other part. The emotion—the stakes—comes from the characters, from their chemistry, from what we know about them. It doesn’t really matter what happens externally if you don’t care about the characters and want them to be together and to be happy.

If you had the chance to step into the life of one of your own characters, which one would you choose, and why? What qualities, experiences, or inner conflicts make this character resonate with you on a personal level? In what ways do they reflect your worldview, values, or perhaps aspects of yourself that you don’t often express? What sets this character apart from the others you’ve created? Would you say they reveal more of you than most? Was there perhaps an instance of “author slippage” coming through when you wrote this character, conscious of the fact or otherwise?

I never consciously put myself in my stories, although many people tell me they see a lot of me in Robin Shipp (from The Moth and Moon). Given that he’s very large, clumsy, and not that bright, I’m never quite sure how to take it. But I suppose I can see their point. He was my first “real” character, so I suppose he’s got a lot of me in him. And while I don’t know that I’d want to be him exactly, I’d definitely pick his world to live in—a world without prejudice towards LGBTQ+ people, a world where gender isn’t an issue, a world where kindness wins. It would be nice.

Glenn, fiction is just one facet of your creative identity. You’re also an accomplished visual artist, working across a wide range of media including acrylics, watercolours, pastels, pencil, and ink. How does your process as an artist compare to your process as a writer? Do these disciplines offer distinct avenues for expression, or do they intersect in ways that surprise even you? You’ve merged them beautifully in the past, such as the limited edition art print you released for purchase alongside your first Haunted Hearts novel, Curse of the Stag’s Eye.  You also designed both Haunted Hearts series’ Logos. When it comes to time, emotional investment, and creative fulfilment, how do visual and literary storytelling measure up for you, particularly within your more mature, occasionally erotic, body of work?

They each scratch a particular itch in my brain. There are days when all I want to do is write, and there are days when all I want to do is draw. (And when I say days, they can sometimes be weeks or even months.) They both allow me to express my ideas in different ways. [Self Portrait (in image on right) by Glenn Quigley.]

Some ideas can only be realized visually, while others can only be expressed in writing. I love being able to illustrate my characters. I had a long-running feature in my newsletter where I provided portraits and biographies of my characters from The Moth and the Moon universe. They’re all up on my website. [Link at bottom].

It was also fun to design the maps of the islands (also on my website) where those stories are set. I know some readers prefer not to see character art and instead let the books form an image in their minds, but I think if I can expand the books into another medium, I might as well.

I’m a comic book fan at heart, so I think there’s always something in me that wants to see my stories as well as read them. 

What book(s) are you currently devouring? Do you have a preferred genre, or are your reading preferences quite diverse?

I’ve just finished a beta read of a friend’s novel (it’s great!), and before that, I was reading a book about lighthouses (because I’m always on brand, apparently). I don’t really have a favourite genre. I read for research as much as for pleasure. It takes me quite a while to read a book, weirdly enough. I think my next one is going to be one of the Haunted Hearts books. I’ve already read one, Christian Baines’ Andalusia Dogs, and it was fantastic, so I can’t wait to see what the rest of the series holds.

 What does the future hold for author Glenn Quigley? Outside of the Haunted Hearts series, do you have any desire to explore the world of the supernatural further? Are there plans to continue any of your historical fiction series? Give us a glimpse into your future!

My books often feature a supernatural element. Ghost stories crop up a lot. There’s one in The Moth and Moon, another in We Cry the Sea, and even in my contemporary novel, Teacup Promises. I really want to do something with the paranormal podcast gang from Curse of the Stag’s Eye, and they are connected to the characters from Heart of the Wren (How? You’ll have to read it to find out!), so I can see myself staying in the world of the paranormal for a while longer.

I have started writing book three of the Knights of Blackrabbit series (it isn’t a trilogy, it’s an ongoing), which I put on pause to write Heart of the Wren. Believe it or not, I actually woke up this morning with the Blackrabbit characters talking in my head, so I think they’re getting impatient. I should really get back to them.

Thank you so much, Glenn, for sharing your journey and thoughts on your work in Gay/Queer Paranormal and Historical Romance. It was a pleasure to hear about what motivates you as both an author and an artist. I look forward to seeing where your future projects take you! 

For more information about this author and artist, follow Glenn Quigley on InstagramFacebookBluesky, or visit his Website, where you can sign up for his Newsletter and purchase his artwork.

To purchase Glenn’s books, head to Barnes & Noble, Indigo, and Smashwords. Also check out his website and his Amazon Author Page.

Canadian LGBTQ+ Culture & The Shift In Queer Theory

THIS article was sparked by a discussion I had with my husband about my occasional use of Queer Theory in conversations about contemporary queer issues, as well as in literary and other contexts. He pointed out that some of the terminology felt “dated.” So, I wondered: has Queer Theory evolved, or is it outdated? Am I utilizing antiquated thinking?

Queer Theory emerged in the 1990s to question and disrupt conventional notions of gender and sexuality. Canada had developed its own unique characteristics around Queer Theory, shaped by the country’s specific cultural, political, and social contexts.

In the mid-to-late 1990s, while I was studying at the University of Guelph, Queer Theory was a significant part of both my academic focus and the activist discussions around me—especially through my involvement with GLoBe, our university’s so-so diverse queer social group. It was an exciting time, but also a challenging one (though, when isn’t it?).

The LGBTQ+ community (then referred to as LGBT) was becoming increasingly visible, with individuals “coming out” at younger ages than in previous years. At the same time, we were still grappling with the devastating effects of the AIDS crisis, ongoing discrimination, and limited legal protections. In this context, Queer Theory in Canada emerged as a powerful tool for critique.

Canadian queer thinkers and artists were adopting ideas from poststructuralist theory, but grounding them in local, lived issues, such as public health policy, censorship, and national identity. There were also significant conversations around rights—same-sex marriage and adoption were central concerns—but there was just as much energy devoted to questioning the systems behind those struggles.

Creative minds like Thomas Waugh, Gary Kinsman, John Greyson, and Sky Gilbert were key voices in this movement. Waugh, for instance, explored how queer cinema could be both erotic and political, resisting dominant narratives about who queer people were supposed to be. Greyson did this, too, especially in his groundbreaking film Zero Patience (1993), which took on the AIDS crisis through musical, campy, and radically political storytelling.

Gary Kinsman’s work, especially his book The Regulation of Desire, showed how deeply the Canadian state had policed sexuality, whether through criminal law or Cold War-era surveillance by the RCMP. His work reminded us that queer lives were always being shaped by broader systems of power and control, not just by cultural representation.

Sky Gilbert, who often spoke at our university’s queer events, brought a sharp, theatrical, and often provocative voice to queer issues. His work wasn’t for everyone; some folks found it too sexually charged and focused on a white, gay male perspective/experience. Still, the man and his work have always been undeniably bold, honest, and unapologetic.

In the 90s, Canadian Queer Theory leaned heavily into anti-assimilationist politics, often inspired by groups like ACT UP and Queer Nation. But it also had to navigate Canada’s particular form of liberal multiculturalism, where diversity was celebrated in theory. However, many queer, Indigenous, and racialized people still faced serious marginalization in practice.

Fast forward to today, and it’s clear how many things have shifted. Contemporary Queer Theory in Canada is deeply entrenched in intersectionality, decolonial theory, trans studies, and grassroots activism. It’s less about just deconstructing gender and sexuality and more about building new ways of living and relating, especially in communities facing multiple layers of oppression.

One of the most significant shifts has been the rise of Indigenous queer and Two-Spirit voices, which have challenged both heteronormativity and the assumptions baked into early Queer Theory itself. And these aren’t “new concepts.” I had an indigenous ex-boyfriend back in university (who shared the same name as me—yes, we were called “The Ryans”) who introduced me to Two-Spiritness. (Side note: In the 90s, I dated not one, but TWO men with the same name as me. Don’t ask.)

Academics and writers like Lindsay Nixon and Billy-Ray Belcourt have urged us to rethink everything, from how colonialism influences queer identities to how liberation is inextricably linked to land, culture, and sovereignty. Belcourt, a Cree poet and theorist, writes beautifully about queer Indigenous life, not just as a struggle, but as something full of love and possibility. In his book A History of My Brief Body (2020), he weaves together desire, trauma, and hope, showing how queer and Indigenous worlds intersect.

Two-Spirit perspectives, in particular, have called out the limitations of Western ideas of queerness and gender, pointing instead to pre-colonial understandings that don’t fit neatly into those frameworks. This has compelled Canadian queer theory to look beyond its academic roots and thoughtfully engage with histories and experiences that were often overlooked in earlier conversations.

Syrus Marcus Ware, a Black trans artist and theorist, is a voice at the forefront of this shift. His work blends abolitionist politics, disability justice, and trans liberation, offering a vision of queer futurity that’s deeply rooted in care, resistance, and community.

So where early Queer Theory in Canada was about breaking categories and subverting norms, today’s queer thought is about survival, solidarity, and collective care. It’s a move from theory as critique to theory as action; still rigorous, but grounded in lived experience and real-world change.

Throughout all of this, Canadian queer culture has played a significant role in shaping Queer Theory, not just responding to global trends, but also helping to transform what queer thinking and action can look like. From the radical disruptions of the 1990s to the intersectional, decolonial, and community-focused work of today, Canadian queer thought reminds us: queerness isn’t just about identity and sexuality. It’s about challenging power, imagining new futures, and building something better as a cooperative voice.

So, the verdict is—? Although 1990s Queer Theory had a significant impact during its time, it’s essential to recognize that this intellectual movement has continued to evolve and change over the years. I’ve now made it a point to engage with the nuances and complexities of contemporary Queer Theory. I’m certain my husband will be thrilled when I use new terms to strengthen my arguments during our friendly debates on literature et all.  

Book Review: By Gaslight by Steven Price

“He had long yellow teeth, a wide face, sunken eyes, pupils as dark as the twist of a man’s intestines.” Steven Price, By Gaslight

STEVEN Price’s By Gaslight is a sprawling, atmospheric historical fiction novel that immerses readers in the thick, sooty fog of London in 1885. It delves deep into the hidden chambers of grief, longing, and identity. The book blends elements of Gothic horror, Victorian grittiness, and queer subtext (wait and hear me out with this aspect…), presenting itself as less of a traditional detective story and more of a slow-burning meditation on the nature of being haunted: by love, by legacy, and by the unknowable truths of others.

At the narrative’s center are two men: William Pinkerton, son of the famed American detective, and Adam Foole, a gentleman thief drawn into London in search of his lost love. They are united by the spectre of Edward Shade, a mythic criminal who once eluded William’s father and now slips through the gaslit shadows of William’s own obsessive pursuit. Their journeys unfold across continents and memories, from war-ravaged battlefields to South African mines, from opium dens to séance halls, mapping a world where secrets rot just beneath the surface.

The Gothic atmosphere is omnipresent and skillfully depicted. Price’s London is a decaying, suffocating city; its air thickened by coal smoke, loss, and regret. The physical environment often mirrors psychological states: pathetic fallacy, a favourite Gothic element of mine. Streets and alleyways twist like jumbled thoughts; darkness and shadows conceal past wrongs, and sewers and loamy earth exhale the stench of things, perhaps people, meant to stay long buried. It’s a city of hauntings, but not so much in the supernatural sense: emotional and moral. This is a story where a place and time, past or present, clings to the characters like damp London fog on skin. (Am I making this sound like a Wilkie Collins’ novel?)

Traditional Gothic motifs abound: mistaken identities, lost loves, spectral figures, and decaying grandeur. Yet Price doesn’t deploy these simply for genre effect. Instead, they create a narrative space where emotional states—grief, obsession, betrayal—are rendered viscerally. The characters are all, in their own ways, haunted. William by his father’s unreachable legacy, Adam by the absence of a woman he once loved, and all by Shade, a figure less man than myth. That Shade may not even exist in the form they imagine only heightens the sense of chasing phantoms.

Set firmly in the Victorian era, the novel also explores the social tensions of the time, though often as backdrop rather than critique. Class divides are starkly illustrated: the genteel surface of London masks a grimy underworld of poverty and exploitation. Meanwhile, Victorian anxieties about science and superstition (How Mary Shelley!), identity and respectability, empire and its costs, all pulse beneath the surface.

Now, let’s take a look at the novel’s compelling queer undercurrents—nuanced, never explicit, but present in tone and structure if one “queers the text.” There is no overt gay/queer romance in the narrative, and I doubt the author intended any; still, the novel teems with queer potential. It resides in the intense emotional bonds between men—a homosocial backdrop, in the way identity slips and reshapes, and in the silences where desire and longing (may) exist. My intent is not to take anything away from platonic friendships and camaraderie between men; I am merely presenting the possibility for a different reader perspective.

The queer subtext aligns with Gothic tradition, where themes of forbidden desire, blurred identity, and unspoken tensions often drive the emotional core of the story. Consider the relationship between Count Dracula and Jonathan Harker in Stoker’s novel. In the repressive moral climate of Victorian society, where deviations from societal norms had to remain concealed, the Gothic genre served as a platform to explore what could not be explicitly stated. Price follows this tradition but stops short of fully illuminating these themes, again, because he presumably, consciously, never intended them.

Here are some great examples of coded subtext within the novel:

“Desire often lives in the silences between words, in the things we dare not say.”
“To be seen is to be vulnerable. To be unseen is to be free — and utterly alone.”

This is what makes “queering a text” so exciting, if you know what to look for. That said, I wasn’t consciously looking for it as I read this novel, but lines like the ones above sparked something in me that caused me to “queer between the lines.”

Structurally, the novel requires patience and diligence to get the Poe-esque style pay-off. Perhaps even an
appreciation for the non-traditional technique. Its length (I read the hardcover, which is nearly 740 pages!) and elliptical style may overwhelm some readers. Flashbacks within flashbacks, long descriptive passages, and multiple shifting perspectives abound. However, for those willing to surrender to its deliberate pace, the novel offers a richly layered experience.

I read one person describe Price’s writing here as “an extremely pretentious writing style,” which, of course, intrigued me. I appreciate a “so-called” pretentious writing style, particularly relating to 19th-century-centred fiction. It adds a sense of authenticity to the tone. Dan Simmons and Matthew Pearl are other modern authors who excel at capturing this historical fiction style. One reader’s “pretentious” is another’s “sophisticated flair.”

Steven Price’s By Gaslight is more than just a story about crime and pursuit; it’s a novel that explores the unseen aspects of human lives: the things and truths we hide and the identities and relationships we struggle to define. Price’s work integrates smoothly into the Gothic tradition while also making subtle and meaningful references to the queerness that has historically existed in society’s shadows, regardless of whether the author intended to infer this subtext or whether it was a happy accident that leaves room for reader inference. And if you leave me room, I will infer.

By Gaslight is available for purchase at indigoamazon.ca, Barnes and Noble, and amazon.com.

Canadian poet & novelist Steven Price does not actively participate in social media.

INTERVIEW WITH GAY ROMANCE AUTHOR SIMON DOYLE

Simon Doyle: “As a gay man, I write both of my younger self and to my younger self. I didn’t have any queer literature growing up, so I eventually turned to writing the stories I longed for.”

Simon Doyle is an Own-Voice, Irish author whose work explores the complex intersections of age, identity, love, and, occasionally, the supernatural, with an emphasis on gay/queer experiences. Driven by the stories he needed growing up, his storytelling features emotionally resonant characters, atmospheric settings, and a strong commitment to authenticity, providing readers with narratives that are entertaining, meaningful, and always diverse. He lives in Ireland with a neurotic rescue dog and his husband, Lucas.

Simon is the author of several gay YA romances, including The Sound of You, Snow Boys, with its short story companion piece entitled Snow Girl: A Snow Boy’s Story, and the two-book Runaway Bay series. He’s also penned the neo-gothic This Is Not A Vampire Story, a haunting gay paranormal romance.

In this interview, Simon and I explore a range of topics, including the use and impact of tropes and clichés, navigating queer trauma in fiction, and the ways personal life and history can shape one’s writing.

My review of Simon Doyle’s This Is Not A Vampire Story can be found in an earlier blog post.

When reflecting on the origins of your writing, both as a personal journey of creative expression and as a professional pursuit, who or what do you credit as your primary inspiration? At what point did you realize it was time to move beyond writing solely for yourself and step into the often intimidating realm of publishing? How do you manage the anxiety that comes with sharing your work with a global audience?

I don’t think I could credit any one particular author for inspiration as much as I (blame) my parents. They were both readers and taught me the value of a good book. They went from reading bedtime stories to me to helping me to read on my own. By the age of 4 or 5, I was reading Dr. Seuss books; by 7 or 8, I was reading old, yellowed copies of The Hardy Boys; and by 12, I was reading Stephen King (despite my mum’s warnings!). If I had to pick one author as an early influence, I’d go with Dr. Seuss. Those are the first books I actually remember reading on my own.

I’ve been writing for myself almost as long as I can remember. I started with some terrible poetry and some stick-figure comic book stories as a child, and I wrote my first full (completed) novel at 16. It was awful. Trust me, governments could use it as a torture device! But I’d dabbled in WattPad for a while, with some queer short stories, and the encouragement I received was immense. By the time I’d completed Runaway Train, it wasn’t so much a conscious decision to publish in book form (instead of piecemeal on WattPad) as a natural progression.

It was always my goal to be a writer, even when grown-ups said I needed a backup plan. I told my English teacher in high school to look out for my name on a book cover one day. I was 14 at the time, haha! So I never found it intimidating to put my work out there. Nerve-wracking, yes (it still is!), but never intimidating.

Sometimes I feel like I can’t manage the anxiety that comes with sharing my work. I’ve had to step away from social media a few times to breathe. Don’t ask me for a coping strategy, because my strategy is basically: close eyes, release book, cringe, wait for criticism, and repeat. And I can’t re-read that story later. As a writer, you know how it goes: the first draft is terrible, then you read and edit it a bazillion times. Once it’s out there, you can’t read it again, or you’ll find something wrong with it. I’m like that with life, too. Once it’s done, it’s done. Move on.

What about the genre of Romance, particularly within the realm of YA, inspires and excites you? In your view, what are the essential elements that make a love story truly compelling? How does writing gay/queer romance, especially in a young adult or teenager context, reshape or transform these elements, particularly when adapting traditionally heteronormative romance themes for a same-sex narrative?

Middle-grade stories are hopeful. Grown-up stories are often jaded and bleak. YA, for me, is that happy medium between the two. At 16, you still have hopes and dreams, but you know the way of the world. It’s that crossover between youthful, childish glee and the darkness of being an adult.

There’s also, for me, this second run of firsts. Your first run is the first step, first tooth, first word, etc. The second run of firsts is first kiss, first love, first heartbreak. And everything feels amplified as a teenager. I bet you still remember your first heartbreak. I certainly do! Those enormous emotions are what I love about YA. Give me angst mixed with the tenderness of tentative touches!

The essential elements of a love story have to be chemistry and conflict. Chemistry is what gives you butterflies right when you need them. Conflict is what gives you action and movement.

As a gay man, I write both of my younger self and to my younger self. I didn’t have any queer literature growing up, so I eventually turned to writing the stories I longed for. But queer stories themselves aren’t any different from heteronormative stories. I have always set out to show that queer love is just the same as straight love. We all have longing, joy, connection and heartbreak. Love is love. Isn’t that what we’ve been telling the world for decades?

Gay/Queer Romance, particularly M/M, as a genre can sometimes risk falling into formulaic tropes or fetishization. How do you maintain emotional honesty and depth in your stories, ensuring they feel genuine rather than performative? Do you find that writing from an Own-Voice perspective offers you a unique advantage in achieving this authenticity? 

Oh, I love a good trope! The Sound of You, for example, deliberately steals a number of tropes from Korean BL [Boys’ Love] stories. Our lives are built around tropes. Cliches are cliches for a reason. But tropes only work if they’re handled with care. As writers, we have to take the formula of the trope, decode it, and repackage it in a way that feels truthful. I want my characters to feel, not just do.

Writing from an Own-Voice perspective definitely has its advantages; I think it’s less a privilege than a responsibility. Representation matters. All stories (not just queer ones) can slip into caricatures if they’re not written well. I want to portray love in a way that feels genuine to me. It keeps coming back to: what is [this thing] for me? It’s more than authentic, it’s personal.

Do you think being gay subconsciously influences your work, making it inherently queer-centric? Or do you feel that, as a writer, you’re always aware of the content you include and you’re actively choosing to write with an LGBTQ+ focus?

I think it’s a little of both. Being gay influences the way I see the world; it’s part of who I am, so it’s going to shape the stories I tell. But I don’t feel as though I’m being intentional with it. I write the kinds of stories I wish I had as a kid, not because I feel limited to writing such stories, but because they represent me on the page. It’s intrinsic.

Snow Boys offers a powerful and intimate exploration of queer adolescence, capturing the fragile, urgent experience of young people coming to terms with their identities in a world that can be both cold and hostile. Set against a bleak, wintry backdrop that brilliantly mirrors the isolation many queer teens feel, the novel centres on characters wrestling with (internalized) homophobia, the fear of rejection, and the aching need for authentic connection. Your portrayal of queer youth is unapologetically honest; there’s no glossing over pain, confusion or the sometimes brutal realities of bullying and invisibility. Yet, you manage to keep it from getting too dark despite the serious themes; the balance between heartwarming and strife is just right. 

Since your YA novels, including Snow Boys, explore identity during some of the most formative, awkward, and vulnerable years for queer youth, how have you developed your approach to portraying queer trauma in a way that avoids exploitation or melodrama, while also being mindful of not retraumatizing readers?

It’s important to be honest about queer trauma because it’s part of so many young people’s realities. Pretending otherwise would feel false. But I’m equally conscious that these stories aren’t here to exploit pain or wallow in it. Trauma should never be used as shock value. It has to come from the characters and from the truth of their lives.

I try to ground those experiences in emotional authenticity, but always balance them with hope. Even in the darkest moments of Snow Boys, there’s connection, tenderness, and the possibility of love. Queer teens deserve to see not just the weight of the world but also the light that gets them through it, that crossover I talked about earlier.

Humour also plays a big role in that balance. I’m Irish, which means we’re great at laughing at ourselves. Humour is woven into my writing almost instinctively—it softens the blow of darker themes and keeps the story from sinking into despair. When something terrible occurs, I always follow it with something light. I think that’s just a natural instinct now. Readers, in my view, crave the warts of humanity, but they don’t want to feel depressed about it. Humour allows me to hit hard but still leave space for hope.

I don’t want someone to walk away retraumatized; they need to feel seen. If just one queer teen reads one of my books and feels a little less alone, then I’ve done my job. And honestly, I’m still getting fan mail from young men more than 2 years after its release, telling me how much it affected them. That alone is why I continue to do it.

Queer desire and loss are central to many Gothic narratives, though often portrayed in coded or tragic ways. In This is Not a Vampire Story, Victor cannot forget James, nor can he live fully in the present. His immortality becomes a kind of prolonged grief—an extended metaphor for the queer experience of carrying memory in a society that has long demanded forgetting, even repression. Much of Victor’s past occurs during a time when queer people were forced to hide their love and relationships.

Now, in the present, he works in a care home, still appearing seventeen, and surrounded by those nearing the end of their lives. His unchanging body contrasts with the aging world around him, and his queerness—like his vampirism—isolates him in a space meant for those nearing death. This setting brings a rare and poignant focus to the theme of queer aging and the emotional toll of surviving both time and erasure.

What drew you to explore the experience of outliving the people you’ve loved and filtering that narrative through the lens of a vampire (though you never use this supernatural classification in the story)? And what does it mean, in your view, for immortal Victor to carry those hidden histories into the present—memories that others have forgotten, or were never allowed to have and/or openly express in the first place? How did you consciously rewrite or reclaim classic Gothic tropes, particularly around loss, secrecy, and the passage of time, for a modern queer audience?

For me, immortality isn’t about glamour or power, it’s about memory. Victor can’t forget James, or any of the lives he’s touched, and that grief becomes part of him. In a way, he embodies the queer experience of carrying memory in a world that has often demanded forgetting or repression. He’s a reminder that history doesn’t vanish just because society looks away.

How he came to be is a complex story. Pain and regret have always had a place in my novels, so what better way to show that than forcing one character to watch his love interest die? Maybe I’m evil; I don’t know (he jokes). Placing him in a care home, surrounded by those at the end of their lives, felt like the perfect mirror. His body never changes, but the world around him does. That contrast lets me explore something rarely seen in queer fiction: the emotional toll of aging—or in Victor’s case, never aging—while still carrying all those hidden histories forward.

At the same time, while I was writing This Is Not a Vampire Story, I was also exploring Buddhism as a practice, and the question of what death really is became central to the novel. From a Buddhist perspective, death is simply a transition, not an ending. That understanding helped shape the novel’s heart. For Victor, too, there comes a shift in how he views mortality: what once seemed terrifying begins to look like release, or even acceptance. It’s a quiet but profound evolution.

I never set out to reclaim gothic tropes or narrative, though in writing about a vampire (and, as you state, I never once use the word “vampire” in the story), it’s difficult to avoid them. Classic gothic stories often coded queer desire as monstrous or doomed. For Victor, I needed something different. He’s not a monster, he’s a queer man navigating the weight of time.

Queer representation is at the heart of your work, but your commitment to inclusivity extends even further. In The Sound of You, Jun-ho Lee, who is half-Korean, is Deaf. As someone who also writes characters with disabilities, I understand how vital it is to portray them with respect and depth, showing that people of all experiences have desires, ambitions, and frustrations. It’s disheartening to see stories where characters are “othered,” with queerness, race or disability reduced to little more than a device for melodrama, stripped of nuance or authenticity.

I do want to acknowledge that many Deaf individuals, particularly those who identify as part of the Deaf community, don’t consider themselves disabled. Instead, they see Deafness as a rich cultural and linguistic identity, primarily through the use of sign language, not as a deficit or impairment.

With Jun, you’ve created a deeply nuanced character whose Deafness is not a limitation, but an integral part of his identity, as is his experience as a biracial person. His character feels authentic and fully realized, not defined by disability but shaped by the richness of his lived experiences. Owen, our love interest, adapts, and with time, communicating with Jun becomes second nature.

What inspired you to write a Deaf character who is also biracial, and was it tricky putting yourself in Jun’s head? What advice would you offer writers who want to respectfully and meaningfully include characters with disabilities in their work, highlighting not just challenges, but also the fullness of their lives, identities, and the importance of acceptance over the trope of overcoming differences?

The inspiration for Jun really came from two places in my life that converged. The first was a newfound love of K-dramas, especially Korean BL dramas. They can be a little silly in terms of plot, but at their core, they almost always carry this deep thread of hope. That sense of hopefulness was something I wanted to weave into The Sound of You.

Secondly, as a child, I had a very good Deaf friend. We lost touch over the years, but what stayed with me was his fierce independence and the way his Deafness wasn’t something that defined him negatively. It was just part of who he was.

That memory became a touchstone when I began shaping Jun. His Deafness is not a deficit, but an integral piece of his identity, alongside his biracial heritage. He’s not “overcoming” anything; he’s living fully as himself.

Was it tricky to put myself in his head? Yes, because I wanted to do it respectfully and with care. But I also approached it the same way I do with any character: by grounding him in humanity first. For writers looking to include characters with disabilities, I’d say not to write them as challenges to be overcome, and not to make their identity the whole story. Do your research, but more importantly, give them the same depth, contradictions, and vitality you’d give any character.

From Dublin to Belfast, the two books in your Runaway Bay series are set against the rich and evocative backdrop of Ireland, with each installment weaving the country’s landscapes, culture, and history into its narrative. In fact, Ireland features prominently throughout all your work. How has your Irish heritage shaped your approach to storytelling? Do you find that Ireland—its history, landscapes, and cultural sensibilities—naturally influences the settings you choose and the characters you create?

Ireland has a history of producing writers, so it must be in my blood! You can’t turn around here without tripping over a poet, playwright, or just someone spinning a good yarn in the pub. Sometimes I think storytelling is baked into the Irish culture. I say all that in jest, but maybe there’s some truth to it.

There’s also truth in that old advice to “write what you know.” Although I’ve lived in London, Leeds, and for a short time in Oklahoma, Ireland is my home first and foremost. It shaped me as much as it shapes my storytelling. So whether I’m writing a contemporary YA novel set in Dublin or a Gothic-esque vampire story, that heritage is always there. I’m influenced by what I see. I can only hope that people understand me when they read my Irish-isms!

If you had the chance to become one of your characters, which one would you choose and why? What specific qualities, experiences or inner conflicts of this character resonate with you personally? How do they reflect your worldview, values, or perhaps even parts of yourself that you don’t often express? What makes this character stand out to you above the others you’ve created? Would you say this character reveals traces of yourself more clearly than the rest, perhaps a subtle instance of “author slippage” showing through?

That’s a tricky question because the truth is I couldn’t choose just one. Every character I write carries a piece of me. Or maybe it’s the other way around, and I carry a piece of them. Either way, I’m already all of them in some way.

There isn’t a single character I’d want to be more than the others, because writing them is already my way of inhabiting them. I get to live through their fears, joys, mistakes, and triumphs.

There’s almost certainly plenty of “author slippage” running through my books, but it’s not confined to any one character. They’re all reflections of me in some way. I’m Victor as much as I am Amaral. Owen is as much me as I am Jun-ho. As a writer, I don’t think there’s any avoiding that.

What book(s) are you currently devouring? Do you have a preferred genre or are you quite diverse in your reading preferences?

My TBR pile is enormous (whose isn’t?!), but at the minute, I’m reading some Zen Buddhist texts as I further my explorations into the practice. And in terms of fiction, I’ve just finished Small Things Like These by Claire Keegan, a fellow Irish writer. It was my first Keegan story, and I wanted to see what the fuss was all about.

I do read mostly queer fiction when I can, but not to the exclusion of all others. I have an eclectic taste in fiction almost as much as I do in music (which, if you ask my husband, simply means “weird”!). I’m also reading some non-fiction textbooks that are helping to lay the foundations for my next novel. To me, “write what you know” means “study it first until you know it, then write.”

What does the future hold for author Simon Doyle? Are there plans to continue the Runaway Bay series? Maybe a desire to explore another gothic-inspired gay paranormal romance novel? “This Is Not A Werewolf Story,” perhaps? (We can workshop this.)

I always go where the story leads. I’ve announced that I won’t be continuing the Runaway Bay series. After eleven (honestly!) distinct attempts at Runaway Ridge (what would have been book 3 in the series), I had to accept that it was a story that refused to be told. Denis and Oliver from book 1, and Caleb and Kai from book 2, will live out their days at Runaway Bay without new arrivals to disturb them. I was young and naïve when I started that series, and my craft has changed so much since then.

As for “This is Not a Werewolf Story,” I originally had a plan for more “This is not a…” stories, and my editor was pushing for an alien story. But I find that when I’m pushed in a certain direction, my brain refuses to go there. It needs to journey on its own in order to feel free enough to write. But that’s not to say I won’t go there one day.

Right now, I’m working on a few very disparate stories simultaneously. My process is basically to throw stories at the wall and see what sticks. It’s messy, but it’s also where the magic happens, because when something does stick, I know I’ve found the one worth chasing. I try not to limit myself to genre beyond the basics: there’ll be love, and there’ll be hurt. But don’t be alarmed if my next novel is set in 16th-century Ireland—or the 26th Century!

Thanks so much, Simon, for sharing your journey and thoughts on your work in Gay/Queer Paranormal and YA Romance. It was a pleasure hearing about what drives you as an author. Can’t wait to see where your projects go next, and I’m wishing you all the best moving forward!

For more information about this author, follow Simon Doyle on Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, or visit his Website. To purchase his work head to Barnes & Noble, Indigo, or check out his Amazon Author Page.

 

 

BOOK REVIEW: GOTHIC REVIVAL BY MICHAEL MULLIN

“It was clear he wanted them all to be in some Gothic story of his creation, but would he really take it to that level?Michael Mullin, Gothic Revival

MICHAEL Mullin’s Gothic Revival is a cerebral and deliciously atmospheric thriller that skillfully intertwines homage to classic Gothic literature with a slow-burning, psychological narrative. Set in an isolated lakeside villa, the novel reunites five former MFA classmates—Chris, Anne, Fiona, Lauren, and Eric—for what begins as a nostalgic creative writing retreat. However, beneath the surface of literary fun lies a sinister current of manipulation, long-buried resentments, and emotional trauma. The retreat quickly devolves from an artistic gathering into a haunting confrontation with the past, as the characters grapple with eerie visions and unravelling relationships.

Gothic Revival draws inspiration from the famous summer of 1816 at Villa Diodati near Lake Geneva, where Lord Byron, Mary Shelley, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and John Polidori—along with Mary’s stepsister (and Byron’s brief lover), Claire Clairmont—were confined indoors due to the unusually rainy and stormy “Year Without a Summer” as it has come to be known.

To pass the time, Byron proposed a ghost story writing contest, which resulted in his poem “Darkness,” Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, and Polidori’s The Vampyre. Byron also wrote a fragment of a vampire horror story that was never completed, known as “Fragment of a Novel.” These works are pioneering benchmarks of Gothic horror and vampire literature, with some, like Shelley’s, also being considered early Science Fiction. Three great films about that summer at Villa Diodati are Ken Russell’s Gothic (1986), Ivan Passer’s Haunted Summer (1988), based on the book of the same name by Anne Edwards, and Haifaa al-Mansour’s Mary Shelley (2017). 

Mullin’s modern interpretation draws both structural and thematic parallels to the Romantic era, while crafting a narrative rooted in the emotional and psychological complexities of contemporary life. The plot follows Eric, a charismatic and manipulative screenwriter, who orchestrates the retreat under the pretense of sparking literary inspiration. He challenges each guest to write a ghost story during their stay. Yet the true ghost stories emerge not from fiction but from memory, trauma, and regret.

As the characters begin to write and reflect, personal tensions and past betrayals rise to the surface. Mullin allows these dynamics to unfold gradually, using a shifting point-of-view structure to immerse the reader in each character’s internal world. Through this lens, the seemingly innocent reunion turns dark, revealing layers of emotional depth, long-held secrets, and psychological instability (the best kind for a Gothic thriller!).

One of the novel’s most compelling elements is its rich character development. Mullin mirrors each of his characters after the Romantic literary figures mentioned above, deepening the meta-literary resonance. Chris and Anne, a married couple struggling with emotional disconnection, evoke Percy and Mary Shelley. The free-spirited Fiona, a clairvoyant, echoes Claire Clairmont, while Lauren, a PhD in Victorian history, mimics the erudite nature of Polidori. Eric, the orchestrator of the retreat, channels Lord Byron: charming, enigmatic, and ultimately cruel. Or, as Lady Caroline Lamb called Byron, “Mad, bad, and dangerous to know!”

A humiliating graduation prank Eric once played on Chris casts a long shadow over the group, poisoning the dynamic and adding depth to the story’s psychological stakes.

The suspense in Gothic Revival is slow-building but effective. Mullin masterfully manipulates the narrative perspective to obscure and reveal just enough to keep the reader questioning what is real. Ghostly apparitions, mysterious noises, and a cryptic housekeeper all add to the atmosphere, but the true horror lies in the emotional and psychological toll on the characters.

The house itself becomes a character, an eerie, ivy-covered estate that seems to absorb the tension within its walls. Its dark hallways, reflective surfaces, and looming presence echo traditional gothic settings while anchoring the story firmly in the modern age. It’s Collinwood Mansion from TV’s Dark Shadows or the Usher House in Edgar Allan Poe’s The Fall of the House of Usher. It’s so good! 

Rather than retell gothic classics, Mullin embeds his narrative with layered literary references. From Frankenstein to Dracula to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, these allusions enrich the reading experience, especially for literary enthusiasts like me. Assigning a character a Romantic-era counterpart adds a clever metafictional dimension to the story. Yes, some readers may find these references luxuriant without prior familiarity with the period or genre, though nothing is incoherent. The intertextuality is not simply decorative; it serves as a thematic foundation that explores creativity, identity, and the echoes of both personal and literary histories. This element is essential to the narrative, and I would argue it aligns precisely with Mullin’s textual and thematic goals for his novel.

Is that presumptuous to say? Maybe, but I stand by it.

The novel explores the price of ambition, the fragility of memory, and the emotional cost of artistic legacy. It feels intimate, tense, and intellectually resonant, which is very much in the style of 19th-century Gothic literature.

The pacing of the novel is intentionally measured, which may make the first half seem slow to some readers. However, I promise you, if you appreciate psychological nuance and character depth you will find the buildup rewarding. The final act delivers a series of satisfying and unexpected twists, tying the narrative threads together in a way that honours both its gothic roots and its modern psychoanalytic sensibility.

The supernatural elements remain understated throughout, never fully explained, never entirely dismissed, leaving readers in a murky space between skepticism and belief, much like the characters themselves. 

Michael Mullin’s Gothic Revival is a haunting meditation on memory, betrayal, and the darker sides of creativity. It delivers a rich, multilayered experience of what I call “emotional deconstruction.” Mullin has crafted a modern gothic story that respects the Gothic genre’s past while offering a compelling vision of its future; it’s moody, chilling, and introspective. Not only did I read it, but I got my dad a copy last XMAS! He loved it!

Gothic Revival is available for purchase at indigoamazon.ca, and amazon.com.

For more information about this author, follow Michael Mullin on InstagramFacebookBluesky, or visit his Website.

It’s Happening Again! Haunted Hearts: Season of the Witch

HAUNTED HEARTS: SEASON OF THE WITCH – EVERYONE DESERVES TO BE SPELLBOUND!

 

HAUNTED HEARTS: SEASON OF THE WITCH IS AN OWN-VOICES GAY PARANORMAL ROMANCE SERIES.

This is the second season of Haunted Hearts, where last year we explored romance between men and the things that go BOO! in the night. This time, it’s the witches’ turn to cast a spell on our readers. Six authors from last year have returned—including me—and we’re thrilled to welcome five new writers from around the world.

Join us on our romantic journeys with eleven books from some of your favourite gay and queer male authors! Every page promises a taste of love, a touch of magic, and the danger of wanting more.

There’s a range of engaging tropes and spice levels between us, along with a diverse spectrum of supernatural elements within each narrative. From Urban Fantasy to Historical Romance to Modern Gothic/Horror, these Own-Voice authors bring their distinct perspectives to the Gay Paranormal Romance genre. Each book is a standalone but why not read them all?

Here are the 11 books in the Haunted Hearts: Season of the Witch series, with author links, in the order they will be released beginning October 1st and ending on the 31st. And we all know what magical day that is!

Memories in BoneJ.P. Jackson
Heart of the Wren Glenn Quigley
Currents of the HeartM.D. Neu
I Will Always Find You – Ryan Lawrence (THAT’S ME!)
A Tall Cup Of JoeMatti McLean
Jade Lion and the Witch BoyCD Rachels
Heart Shaped WreckageShane K. Morton
The Bairwick WitchesEric David Roman
Andalusia DogsChristian Baines
Grayson’s Magical MishapsKevin Klehr
RiftwitchTal Frost

I’ve previously interviewed four of the contributing authors for my BLOG: J.P. Jackson, Eric David Roman, Tal Frost, and Christian Baines. Want to get to know the minds behind their magic? Just click the link in their name and have a read.

Now, let’s take a look at my entry, I WILL ALWAYS FIND YOU, including the awesome cover designed by Samrat Acharjee–with input from yours truly, of course. Logo created by our own Glenn Quigley (who has also graciously contributed artwork to both my HH novels).

HOW FAR WOULD YOU GO TO DEFY FATE FOR TRUE LOVE?

In the shadow of a restless Mount Vesuvius, a grieving Romani witch casts a vengeful spell—one that may cost him his life. At the edge of death, he dares to call out across the veil, a final plea for help.

And something primordial, a magic older than the gods, answers.

Days before the destruction of ancient Pompeii, a grand love is devastated by bigotry and fear within the walls of the great city. But where the Roman gods offer silence, an older, arcane force offers the despondent witch hope: to live and love again, reborn into new eras, new bodies, an eternal search for the soul of the man he lost.

Yet the Wheel of Destiny, that enigmatic celestial force, spins cruelly; it does not take kindly to those who dare to circumvent their fate. From ancient times to modern-day Toronto, Canada, this is the story of a true love that will not be denied by time, fate or death. However, with every reunion comes risk: loss, madness, as well as dark, eldritch forces that seek to do the lovers harm. Destiny may bend, but it does not break without consequence.

I WILL ALWAYS FIND YOU will be released on October 7th, just in time for Halloween, on Amazon as an EBOOK and (soon) in PAPERBACK. While this novel is a stand-alone, it features characters tied to The Night Belongs To Lovers—my first Haunted Hearts book—so reading that story first will enrich your experience and double your pleasure! If you haven’t yet read the immortal love story of Olympius and Coriolanus (Corey), I strongly encourage you to. You won’t be sorry—promise!

PREORDER my book now on AMAZON! Also, check out and PREORDER any or all of the entire Haunted Hearts series on AMAZON!

Haunted Hearts – Everyone Deserves To Be Spellbound!
Haunted Hearts is an Own-Voices Paranormal Romance Series about the bewitching powers that tempt the heart. In a world of spells and secrets, love is the most seductive magic. And the most dangerous!

Queering the Male Witch: Julien Mayfair in Anne Rice’s The Witching Hour

As I’ve previously mentioned, my three favourite characters in literary fiction are Dracula, Louis de Pointe du Lac, and Julien Mayfair. I’ve already delved into the intriguing worlds of Dracula and Louis, with a queer theory focus; now it’s time to turn my attention to Julien, especially in light of the upcoming, stunningly illustrated hardcover of Anne Rice’s The Witching Hour from Books Illustrated Ltd. 

The Witching Hour by Anne Rice from Books Illustrated (2026)

IN Interview with the Vampire, Anne Rice crafted a narrative that deeply explores the fundamental aspects of the human condition: suffering, morality, identity, loneliness, and the search for meaning. Louis, the novel’s soulful narrator, is the perfect embodiment of this philosophical exploration. Unlike his immortal maker Lestat, who embraces vampirism, Louis remains haunted by his lingering humanity. His existential crisis becomes the lens through which Rice examines what it truly means to be human, even when one is forever outside of humanity, othered, though bound to exist among them.

Julien Mayfair from Rice’s 1990 novel, The Witching Hour, beautifully merges Louis’ profound compassion for the human spirit with Lestat’s fierce passion for physicality and the pleasures of the mortal realm. Julien wields influence in both the mundane world—through wealth, charm, and intellect—and the metaphysical realm—through the powers of mind and spirit. Yet, unlike Rice’s vampires, he is bound by mortality; he must claim his place in the world by embracing all it has to offer within a single lifetime.

Perhaps it’s this stark disconnection from the concept of immortality that makes Julien’s psyche so captivating and his character arc stand out in such a remarkable way compared to others. Well, at least to me.

The Witching Hour explores the gothic and supernatural through the lens of generational trauma, power, and identity in the Mayfair family, a dynasty of witches bound to a mysterious, powerful, and sensual spirit named Lasher. Among the many complex characters that populate Rice’s expansive narrative, Julien Mayfair stands out not only as, arguably, the most powerful Mayfair witch but also as a queer figure who subverts gendered norms of magic, lineage, and desire.

Julien Mayfair by Bruno Vergauwen (from the Books Illustrated hardcover edition of Anne Rice’s The Witching Hour)

As the only male witch in a matrilineal line of female witches, Julien’s birth marks a rupture in the family’s tradition; paradoxically, it’s this break from convention that grants him unprecedented power.

His bisexuality, his freedom in expressing it, especially in a time of repression and social prejudice, and his erotic relationship with Lasher further position him as a liminal figure. And though it must be noted that pretty much all the witches bang Lasher at some point, not all share the same depth of intensity or intimacy in their relationships with him. 

The Mayfair legacy includes an inheritance of preternatural gifts. Power is passed from mother to daughter. Into this system, Julien Mayfair is born, a male child who inherits and exceeds the powers traditionally granted to female heirs. This inversion of the expected order signals more than just an anomaly: it represents a queering of the familial and magical structure.

In queer theory (a favourite topic of mine), such disruptions of normative frameworks, be they of gender, sexuality, or lineage, are critical moments of analysis. Julien’s very existence destabilizes the supposed naturalness of gender roles within magical inheritance. His birth “breaks” the line, yet this rupture leads to a surge in power, suggesting that the rigidity of tradition has perhaps been a limitation rather than a strength.

Julien’s power is not simply equal to that of the female Mayfairs of his time: it’s greater. He communicates with Lasher more clearly, commanding respect along with the expected desire. While Lasher does not explicitly express fear toward Julien, their complex relationship suggests a dynamic that involves a level of wariness on Lasher’s part.

A young Julien Mayfair (before his hair turned prematurely white.)

Julien was initially outside Lasher’s favour due to a prior oath to the first Mayfair witch not to “smile upon” male descendants. Despite this, Julien’s witch abilities and his willingness to engage with Lasher, both sexually and through allowing Lasher to possess his body, indicate a certain level of mutual influence and manipulation. This interaction is part of Lasher’s broader plan to produce stronger witches through incestuous unions within the Mayfair family, aiming to eventually be reborn in a powerful physical form.

Julien’s unexpected power offers a chance to infuse the genetic line with unprecedented strength and potency, which Lasher comes to see. Case in point: Mary Beth, Julien’s daughter/niece. A powerful witch not seen among the Mayfair women in some time; she potentially rivals her father in power.

This superiority, rooted in his male identity, brings with it both privilege and curse. In this sense, Rice seems to be playing with the idea of patriarchal dominance while simultaneously undermining it: Julien’s power is exceptional because it deviates from tradition, not because it conforms to patriarchal standards. The irony is that his masculinity—his intrusion into a female space—makes him queer within his own lineage. What’s also compelling about Julien is that he never shies away from, nor disdains, his more feminine traits. All is a tool for power over others, either through charm, seduction, or manipulation.

Rice never shied away from queer subtext and subversion, and Julien Mayfair is a prime example of this commitment. Julien’s bisexuality, while not the central focus of his storyline, is unmistakably present and deeply tied to his enigmatic persona. His relationships with women and men (including his own family members!) are often marked by power dynamics that reflect his commanding presence as a witch and patriarchal figure.

One could say that Julien suffers from an acute sense of entitlement, perhaps even narcissism, and yet, paradoxically, these flaws somehow make him all the more, if not endearing, magnetic. Men and women are drawn to him.

You could say that Julien’s bisexuality mirrors his broader identity; he’s neither a traditional witch nor a complete outsider. His function within the narrative is not to fit into any singular role or (yes, I’m going to say it) position. From a queer theoretical perspective, his sexual fluidity becomes a metaphor for his magical and familial fluidity. His power emerges not from fixed roles but from his ability to exist in and traverse multiple categories.

Julien’s relationship with Lasher, the spirit bound to the Mayfair line, is perhaps the most telling aspect of his queerness. The connection between Julien and Lasher is deeply intimate and unmistakably erotic. Yet, unlike most of the witches who came before him, this man is not so easily seduced by the spirit, never readily willing to surrender his agency for romance or sex. Julien’s ego is his shield, sometimes his weapon, against the control and/or influence of others, including Lasher.

Rice imbues their interactions with a sensual charge, blurring the boundaries between dominance and submission, master and servant, creator and created. Julien seemingly commands Lasher fully, yet their bond is symbiotic and deeply entangled in emotional and spiritual need.  

In queer theory, the interplay of power, desire, and identity is central. Julien and Lasher’s relationship embodies a homoerotic tension that transcends traditional romantic and sexual paradigms. Lasher’s desire to be made flesh, eventually realized through later generations, can be seen as an allegory for forbidden or suppressed desire seeking embodiment. Julien, as one who clearly understands Lasher and yet willfully manipulates him, becomes both object and subject of the spirit’s desire made manifest.

Moreover, Lasher becomes a projection of Julien’s own internal contradictions; he reflects Julien’s power, ambition, and longing, but also his alienation. Lasher’s fixation on the Mayfairs is driven as much by possession and selfish desire as by connection and love. One could say the exact same thing about Julien regarding his relationship to pretty much anyone he brings into his life, into his web of influence.

Their relationship is emblematic of the queer experience: intense, complex, and often existing outside of heteronormative structures of love or family. Both are preternatural, yet each yearns for a distinctly human connection and way of being. And like much in life, things get messy; they have the power to use and care, act and react, destroy and enliven, love and hate. And they embrace it all.

Only when Mary Beth’s true power emerges and age begins to affect him does Julien’s once-immutable hold over Lasher wane. A strong example of this shift is the burning of his autobiography by Mary Beth, who by this point had supplanted her father/uncle as Lasher’s primary focus. Julien could neither command nor persuade Lasher to aid him. And though he ultimately used his own telekinetic power against Mary Beth—briefly frightening and halting her—it was no longer strong enough to stop her. Julien, a mortal, had finally been diminished by age.

Through the character of Julien Mayfair in her novel, The Witching Hour, Rice crafts a narrative that queers the very idea of legacy and inheritance. His story is not just about preternatural power; it’s about the subversion of norms and the potency that lies in deviation. In doing so, Julien Mayfair becomes not only arguably the most powerful Mayfair witch but also one of Rice’s most profoundly queer and captivating creations.

Review: This is Not A Vampire Story By Simon Doyle.

“And then there was blessed silence. I swam in the darkness and there was nothing, no sound to injure me. Not even my heartbeat.” – Simon Doyle, This is Not A Vampire Story

SIMON Doyle’s This is Not a Vampire Story is a novel that transcends genre expectations while still embracing the emotional and aesthetic traditions of Gothic literature. Despite its provocative title, the book does engage with the vampire mythos, not through horror or bloodlust, but by exploring themes of queer desire, memory, and loss.

Victor Callahan is a vampire trapped in the form of a seventeen-year-old. Rather than a figure of terror, he becomes a vessel for quiet reflection. The story unfolds as a restrained and intimate exploration of love—both hidden and openly expressed, romantic and platonic—of grief that lingers beyond time, and of identities shaped by repression, secrecy, and longing.

The pairing of queerness and Gothic has long literary roots. From Sheridan Le Fanu’s Carmilla to Anne Rice’s Interview with the Vampire, the vampire has often functioned as a metaphor for otherness, forbidden desire, and queer identity. In This is Not a Vampire Story, Doyle draws on this tradition. However, instead of emphasizing the monstrous or eroticized aspects of the vampire, he uses Victor’s immortality as a metaphor for queer loneliness and the enduring trauma of lost love.

Set partly in mid-century (1949 onward) Ireland, a time and place marked by the criminalization and stigma of homosexuality, the novel chronicles Victor’s relationship with James O’Carroll, a mortal. Their love exists under constant threat, hidden from society, and is ultimately shattered by forces beyond their control. The tragedy of their separation isn’t just a romantic loss; it becomes a symbol of the many queer love stories throughout history that were silenced or erased.

[For more on this topic, check out Loving: A Photographic History of Men in Love, 1850s to 1950s by Hugh Nini & Neal Treadwell (Oct 2020)]

This is Not a Vampire Story is told in first-person. Structurally, it alternates between past and present, with Victor now living at Lakeshore Manor, an elder care facility in 2018. These alternating timelines serve to emphasize how the past continues to haunt the present, not just for Victor, but also for the people around him. In classic Gothic fashion, time does not move cleanly forward. Instead, it loops and bleeds into itself. The present is filled with ghosts of the past—not literal ones, but the lingering effects of love, regret, and secrets.

Victor cannot forget James, nor can he live fully in the present. His immortality becomes a prolonged grief, an extended metaphor for the queer experience of living with memory in a society that has demanded forgetting.

Doyle’s approach to the Gothic is subtle; it’s Gothic without gore. He builds atmosphere through tone, setting, and emotional weight. The coastal Irish landscape is windswept and lonely. The interiors of Lakeshore Manor are quiet, filled with shadows and empty corridors. Characters whisper more than they shout. The horror here is far more internal than external, rooted in memory and repression rather than outside threats of blood lust and supernatural savagery.

This emotional restraint regarding overt supernatural elements enables Doyle to concentrate on character development and thematic depth. The novel particularly explores how queer individuals experience time, conceal love, preserve memory, and how trauma, once experienced, stubbornly lingers. The Gothic tradition’s intrigue with secrets, madness, and the uncanny is redirected to focus on queer inner experiences.

What makes Doyle’s novel especially compelling is that it treats queerness not merely as a romantic subplot, but as a lens through which to explore human relationships more broadly. Secondary characters, particularly Gloria, a night nurse with her own complicated past, and James’ now-elderly friends, are given space to reflect on their relationships, losses, and moral failures.

By positioning Victor in a care home, Doyle also touches on a theme rarely addressed in vampire fiction: queer aging. Though Victor’s body does not age, the world around him does. His queerness, like his vampirism, separates him from others, especially in a space designed for those nearing the end of (human) life. Here, Doyle seems to ask: What does it mean to outlive the person or people you love? What does it mean to remember what others have forgotten or were never allowed to know?

Though its title states otherwise, This is Not a Vampire Story is very much a vampire story, one told through a queer, Gothic, and profoundly human lens. Well, perhaps that statement is somewhat misleading. This novel is a story about immortality/agelessness and its complex, beautiful and tragic relationship to mortality seen through the eyes of a vampire.

Doyle has crafted a novel that uses the conventions of the Gothic not for shock or spectacle, but for emotional truth. His creations do not dazzle; they grieve. They do not stalk; they remember. In doing so, Doyle aligns the vampire not with monstrosity, but with the enduring ache of a (queer) love that must be hidden, protected, and finally mourned.

Maybe the true monster is not the vampire, but time itself.

Simon Doyle’s This is Not a Vampire Story is not a horror novel. It’s a quiet, poetic narrative of reflection, a love letter to memory, if you will; it’s a compassionate meditation on how the past (inevitably?) shapes who we are. An evocative, poignant work, Mr. Doyle.

Lastly, I’m completely obsessed with the one cover: the haunting moon, the moody blue/black colouring, the ship (a nod to Bram Stoker’s “The Demeter” from Dracula), and the near-glowing Gothic script. I want this as a poster.

This is Not A Vampire Story is available for purchase at indigo, amazon.ca, and amazon.com.

For more information about this author, follow Simon Doyle on Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, or visit his Website.

 

 

Review: Brimstone: A Story From The Reels By Brian B. Ewing

“Immediately, a burning sensation gathered and popped in his fingertips. It began in the hand and worked its way up to his arm. At the same time, Sisto could see his vision start to dim in and out and once he closed his eyes, a flicker on the back of his eyelids started to increase in frequency.” – Brian B. Ewing, Brimstone: A Story From The Reels

WHAT happens when gritty realism collides with the uncanny? When hard-boiled detective work intersects with glimpses of the future? In Brimstone: A Story From The Reels, the 3rd installment of The Reels series, Brian B. Ewing has once again seamlessly blended the grounded tension and character-driven plot of a police procedural with the eerie wonder of the contemporary urban fantasy trope of the psychic detective.

At the heart of Brimstone is Tom Sisto—a homicide detective unlike any other. He’s sharp, driven, and despite his psychic gift, deeply human. And being human means being flawed. He’s come a long way from the version of himself we met in Oracle, the first book in the series. Back then, he was still raw, uncertain, carrying the weight of grief and guilt like a second skin.

Now, in Brimstone, Sisto is more confident, more capable, and more in control of the prophetic visions known as “The Reels.” But confidence doesn’t mean clarity. He still wrestles with those quiet, crushing doubts: Am I good enough? Can I stop what’s coming? What if I fail, and someone dies?

And this time, failure could cost him everything.

Years ago, Sisto lost his brother, along with his brother’s family; this was a blow that left scars he still carries. That grief shaped him, pushed him toward isolation, and made him not want more out of life. But now? He’s built something new. He’s created his own family, carved from pain and persistence and maybe even hope: his girlfriend and soon-to-be baby mama. That makes the danger Sisto faces in Brimstone feel more intimate. More dangerous. Because this time, it’s not just about justice. It’s about protecting the people he loves from a future only he can see—and only he might be able to stop.

Again, you can’t talk about Tom Sisto without talking about his invisible partner: The Reels, a gift (or curse?) that allows him to see flashes of the future.

Ewing never writes these visions as vague hunches or metaphorical dreams. They’re raw, haunting premonitions. They’re visceral, often violent glimpses into events that will unfold unless Sisto intervenes. It’s like Final Destination, only here, the future isn’t an unavoidable death sentence; it’s a puzzle to be solved. And with the right timing and cleverness, Tom can beat the clock. But in a crime thriller like Brimstone, absolutes rarely apply, and that’s precisely what makes the story so compelling. The “what ifs?”

Tom Sisto’s visions have become a tool for self-preservation, for both good and bad. There’s an almost subconscious belief Sisto holds that The Reels aren’t just prophetic, but protective. That buried somewhere within those fragmented visions is a self-preservation mechanism, like the body’s instinctual flinch before impact. It’s a seductive idea: that as long as the visions keep coming, as long as he listens, he’ll survive. Is it arrogance? Delusion? Or just survival logic twisted through trauma?

But the danger in that belief is clear: the more Sisto trusts The Reels to keep him alive, the more he gambles with risk, convinced that fate won’t let him fall. That faith might be his greatest strength or the blind spot that gets him killed. And with a baby on the way, this isn’t just about Sisto being a good man, a good cop anymore. It’s about him surviving to be a father.

Ewing nails this dynamic tension, delivering not only the pulse-pounding thrills of the genre but also the intimate drama of two people trying to build a life amidst trauma, dangerous work, and uncertainty. And not just our heroes and victims, but the villain(s) seeking revenge and doing so in violent, uncompromising ways. The action sequences are, as I expect from an Ewing novel, incredibly cinematic. The beginning of the story, with the shoot-out in the alley and the car chase, highlights the best of gore and exhilaration.

Where Ewing truly delivers is not just in the high-stakes action or the psychic intrigue, but in the rich, layered character development. His characters don’t just move the story, they carry it, full of contradictions, heart, and hard-won growth. Personalities feel real. Relationships are messy. The drama feels earned. It’s why The Reels series doesn’t just entertain: it sticks with you.

The result is that Brimstone hums with tension, not just from the crimes Sisto investigates or the danger he faces, but from the ever-ticking clock of fate. Each vision he receives pulls him deeper into a web of moral and emotional gray areas. Should he act on what he’s seen? What happens if he doesn’t? And how far is too far when you’re trying to rewrite the future before it happens?

The connection to Oracle and the events of Sisto’s long past are exciting, and I love a great revenge story, although I usually find myself on the side of the one seeking it. This time, the tables are turned on their head. This story is all about that constant push and pull of action and reaction, choice and consequence. Every decision, past and present, echoes forward, and in Brimstone, the weight of those choices is never abstract; it’s deeply personal, and sometimes heartbreakingly irreversible.

Ewing crafts a world where the metaphysical doesn’t overwhelm: it enriches. Saratoga City feels lived-in, raw with corruption, loss, and potential. And as Sisto walks the line between cop and conduit, hunter and prey, reader and character alike are pulled into a high-stakes dance with destiny, where every second counts, and every choice could be the one that rewrites the future or finally buries the past.

Sisto is probably at his most likeable in this installment so get ready to really root for him! Brilliant, gritty, and electrifying! It’s a must read!

Check out my interview with author Brian B. Ewing in an earlier Blog Post.

Brimstone: A Story From The Reels is available for purchase at amazon.ca and amazon.com. For more information about this author, follow Brian B. Ewing on Instagram or visit his Website.

Our Stories, Our Voices

IN A WORLD that’s increasingly aware of the importance of representation (and “bollocks” to those seeking to dismantle it), the value of authentic queer narratives cannot be overstated. LGBTQ+ stories have routinely been filtered through heteronormative lenses by non-queer writers, often resulting in portrayals that are exoticized, misrepresented, oversimplified, and, unsurprisingly, maligned. Unconscious/implicit bias in writing is just as harmful as deliberately inflammatory content, as both contribute to the perpetuation of stereotypes and marginalization.

Own Voice authors are more than just storytellers. We are cultural truth-tellers, reclaiming space in a literary tradition that has too often erased or distorted our voices. In this piece, I’m speaking specifically about writers who, like myself, are openly gay/queer and who write not only from their own lived experiences but also, more broadly, from the collective experience of their marginalized community.

At the heart of the Own Voices movement is a call for truthful representation: unfiltered, intimate, and rich in both diversity and complexity. When gay/queer authors write about gay/queer characters, they offer a lived reality that no outsider (not meant pejoratively), however well-intentioned, can fully replicate. There’s a vital difference between observation and embodiment. When a gay author writes about coming out, falling in love, facing discrimination, or finding joy in a chosen family, they draw not just from imagination or the research of others’ experiences, but from the emotional and social journey they have personally navigated.

And let’s be clear: there’s absolutely nothing wrong with authors writing beyond their own experiences or “lived realities.” Authors can and should write beyond their own lived experiences. That’s what fiction is, how we grow as writers and as people: by unboxing ourselves and expanding our creative perspectives. However, this must be done with genuine interest and respectful engagement with the people, topics, and situations being represented.

At the time of writing my first novel, Vindictive, I knew nothing about martial arts or fight choreography beyond watching films like Ninja 3: The Domination and Bloodsport countless times growing up. I wanted to replicate those incredible moves for my book so I conducted extensive research on the subject. I didn’t want to come across as sloppy, lazy, or culturally disrespectful—especially to those who live both physically and spiritually within martial disciplines and who are profoundly shaped by their philosophy and practice.

I knew I had succeeded in my goal when Literary Titan wrote, “Readers will recognize that Lawrence did a fair share of research or is a subject matter expert when describing fight scenes. I’m definitely not a subject matter expert, but having pulled off engaging and believable fight scenes means so much to me.

That said, I’ll never claim to fully understand what it’s like to live the martial arts or combat experience. To do so would be a display of arrogance and ego. Although I’m well-versed on the topic, I’m not personally connected to it; I have not lived it. I can only attempt to illustrate it as authentically as possible in my fiction.

Authenticity fosters empathy and connection. It enables queer readers to see themselves not as side characters or cautionary tales, but as whole, dynamic human beings. For non-queer readers, it offers a window into the authentic lives of LGBTQ+ individuals, free from caricature, stereotype or moral lesson. And we queer people are not all the same, living exact experiences.

For example, I will never know the trans-experience, as I’m not a trans person. If I were to write a transgender character, I would strive to portray them as a fully realized individual, not a caricature. And if I were to get something wrong, I would accept criticism with humility and strive to improve. This is where one can benefit from sensitivity beta readers prior to publishing.

In my interview earlier this year with author Tal Frost, a gay trans man, I used a term in our preliminary discussion that did not mean what I believed it did. Knowing I had no ill intent, Tal thoughtfully educated me on the problematic nature of that term so that I could improve my vocabulary and social consciousness. My misuse of this term was a natural mistake, based on a misinterpreted piece of research. This is why “lived experience” is so vital.

Language is constantly evolving, and it’s our personal responsibility to grow with it. In the mid-to-late 1990s, during my time at university, I studied Queer Theory extensively, with a particular focus on gender and sexuality, as well as its application in literature. Today, some of the terms I learned back then, along with aspects of the ideology itself, have shifted and evolved, including racial elements. Learning doesn’t stop once you get that Graduation Diploma.

For decades, the publishing industry has upheld gatekeeping practices that marginalized LGBTQ+ voices, often deeming gay stories as “too niche” or “not marketable. When gay characters were included at all, they were frequently written by straight authors and framed through tropes of tragedy, deviance, or comic relief.

Own Voices authors challenge this pattern. They disrupt the tokenistic inclusion of gay characters by writing rich, diverse narratives that reflect the full spectrum of queer life, its joys, struggles, and everyday experiences—not just trauma. I’ve seen too many non-Own Voice authors portray queer suffering as ultimately insurmountable and attempt to find grace or poetry in the trope of resigned darkness or “dark fate.”

Moreover, Own Voice authors reclaim the right to tell their own stories without compromise. They resist the expectation to center heteronormative audiences or dilute queerness for the sake of palatability. By doing so, they not only expand the literary canon but also affirm the importance of queer perspectives as central, not peripheral, to the human experience.

When gay/queer authors write about queer lives, they draw from a shared cultural memory and deep emotions that speak across generations. These stories offer connection, validation, and hope for young queer readers. They also serve as a record of queer history, from the AIDS crisis to marriage equality and the ongoing fight against anti-LGBTQ+ laws and censorship of queer books in libraries and schools.

While I write Canadian thrillers with a strong queer edge, I’ve also authored two novels that some might categorize as M/M. As part of the Haunted Hearts Own Voices series, with my 2024 novel The Night Belongs to Lovers and the upcoming I Will Always Find You, I’ve explored gay romance themes more deeply than in my thrillers. That said, I don’t personally consider my work to fall neatly into the MM category. I see them more as Gay (Paranormal) Romance.

Though often used interchangeably, M/M romance and gay romance are, in my opinion, distinct genres with different focuses and audiences. M/M is typically written by and for women who enjoy romantic stories between men. These stories tend to prioritize emotional melodrama, fantasy, and romance tropes, often without fully engaging with the real experiences of queer men.

Gay Romance, on the other hand, is more rooted in authentic LGBTQ+ experiences. Often written by gay men or queer authors, it explores not just love, but also identity, community, and the realities of queer life. While both genres have value, Gay Romance generally offers more queer cultural nuance and depth, whereas M/M leans more toward escapist storytelling. Understanding the difference helps readers choose stories that reflect either fantasy or lived experience.

That’s not to say that Gay Romance can’t explore escapist themes (mine certainly do) or that M/M can’t deliver emotional profundity. It’s really based on the author’s “agenda” and creative direction with their storytelling. Even their exposure to gay life in all its variety.

From James Baldwin to Tal Bauer, Edmund White to Andrew Grey, Andrew Holleran to Christopher Rice, Rita Mae Brown to Sarah Waters, Charlotte Charke to Janet Mock, and Jack Halberstam to Tal Frost, these writers have created literary spaces that both affirm queer identities and challenge dominant narratives around masculinity, femininity, desire, family, and romance. Their work exemplifies the transformative power of storytelling deeply rooted in lived experience.

Supporting Gay/Queer Own Voice authors, like myself, is not about exclusion or gatekeeping; it’s about correcting long-standing imbalances and championing authenticity in literature. It recognizes that those who live within marginalized identities are best equipped to articulate their nuances and experiences. Their stories are not optional; they are essential. They educate, heal, empower, and most importantly, humanize.

I will always give flowers to those non-queer authors who step outside themselves and write fully developed, resonant gay/queer characters. Anne Rice, my favourite author, had a profound impact on queer literature and readers, myself included. As a cisgender straight woman, she had an incredible ability to write queer characters with depth, empathy, and nuance. Her work revealed that she was more than just a skilled researcher; she was a writer capable of absorbing and translating the accounts and experiences conveyed to her by her gay friends and colleagues into compelling and relatable fiction. Still, she never claimed to understand queerness at its core, only a desire to represent it to the best of her ability and humanize it.

THIS IS JUST A SMALL SAMPLE OF A TREMENDOUS FOUNT OF OWN VOICE AUTHORS

Anne Rice had an uncanny ability to tap into themes of identity, otherness, forbidden desire, and existential longing, all elements that often echo the lived experiences of LGBTQ+ people. She didn’t just include queer-coded or queer-adjacent characters; she gave them center stage, dignity, sorrow, passion, desires, and agency.

My two favourite queer characters in fiction are both Rice creations: Louis de Pointe du Lac from Interview with the Vampire (Knopf, 1976) and Julien Mayfair from The Witching Hour (Knopf, 1990). Louis’s introspection and moral conflict, alongside Julien Mayfair’s sensuality and charisma, resonated deeply with me as I saw parts of myself in these characters.

In an era where queer lives are still politicized, criminalized, and misunderstood, amplifying gay authors who write from an Own Voice perspective is a necessary act of resistance and reclamation. It serves as a reminder that representation isn’t just about being seen—it’s about being seen honestly and as authentically as possible within a myriad of fictional narratives.

At the end of the day, I would never tell anyone what they can or can’t write; I believe in exploratory storytelling. That said, I will always hold a writer accountable for their work, just as I expect to be held accountable for mine.